2005
DOI: 10.1051/limn/2005006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Marococandona, a new genus of Candonidae (Crustacea, Ostracoda) from Southern Morocco : morphological characteristics and ecological requirements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Until a few years ago, information on non-marine ostracods of the Maghreb was largely based on the contributions by Gurney (1909), Gauthier (1928aGauthier ( , 1928bGauthier ( , 1928c, Klie (1943) and, to a lesser extent, on scattered data in the literature. Only recently, new studies have contributed towards increasing the knowledge on their distribution in this area and with the description of new species (among them, Danielopol et al, 1990;Marmonier et al, 2005;Schmit et al, 2013a). Zaibi et al (2013) reviewed the existing literature on the occurrence of non-marine ostracods in Tunisia and provided new data from a survey carried out in 15 sites from the central and southern part of the country.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Until a few years ago, information on non-marine ostracods of the Maghreb was largely based on the contributions by Gurney (1909), Gauthier (1928aGauthier ( , 1928bGauthier ( , 1928c, Klie (1943) and, to a lesser extent, on scattered data in the literature. Only recently, new studies have contributed towards increasing the knowledge on their distribution in this area and with the description of new species (among them, Danielopol et al, 1990;Marmonier et al, 2005;Schmit et al, 2013a). Zaibi et al (2013) reviewed the existing literature on the occurrence of non-marine ostracods in Tunisia and provided new data from a survey carried out in 15 sites from the central and southern part of the country.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the 7 genera (Candonopsis, Cubacandona, Marococandona, Caribecandona, Pioneercandonopsis, Latinopsis, and Candobrasilopsis) of the tribe Candonopsini, only Caribecandona seems to bear 6-segmented A1 (III and IV segments fused) (Broodbakker 1983;Marmonier et al 2005). According to Karanovic (2012), Marococandona nicolae Marmonier, Boulal and Idbennacer, 2005 has 6-segmented A1, but this seems to be in error as the species was described as having 5 segmented A1 (see Marmonier et al 2005: figs 5A, 7A). Smith (2011) and Smith and Kamiya (2015) described Undulacandona Smith, 2011 with 2 species stating that A1 bears 6 segments where the first 2 segments were partially fused together.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Rugosuscandona gen. nov., the uropod is strongly reduced into a single rod-like claw without spines. Although in other parts of the world, only several species in the tribe (e.g., Marococandona nicolae Marmonier et al 2005, Caribecandona trapezoidea Broodbakker 1983, C. ansa Broodbakker 1983, C. auricularia Broodbakker 1983, and Danielocandona lieshoutae Broodbakker, 1983 show the similar character (see Broodbakker, 1983;Marmonier et al 2005), this is only the second genus with such a rod-like or whip-like uropod that has been described in North America (Külköylüoğlu et al 2011). Moreover, the members of the tribe Candonopsini do not have posterior seta on the uropod.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of them have continued to employ the terms endopodite and/or exopodite when referring to the uniramous antennule. For ostracods see, inter alia, Lowry (1999 onwards), Marmonier et al (2005), Karanovic (2005a). For copepods, again where only single axis antennules are known (Huys & Boxshall, 1991), it has been postulated that the axis is formed by protopodal segments and an endopodal ramus (e.g., Ferrari & Dahms, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%