1994
DOI: 10.1086/467948
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Marriage and Opportunism

Abstract: Our marriage is dead, when the pleasure is fled:Twas pleasure first made it an oath.'

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0
6

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
33
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…By reducing the value of marriage, due to a higher probability of divorce, unilateral divorce law should imply lower fertility. Bargaining models (Brinig and Crafton, 1994, Mc Elroy and Horney, 1981, and Lundberg and Pollak, 1996 also imply a reduction in fertility: according to these models all family decisions are made in strategic ways that depend on the enforceability of the contract and the outside opportunities of each partner.…”
Section: Divorce Laws and Fertilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By reducing the value of marriage, due to a higher probability of divorce, unilateral divorce law should imply lower fertility. Bargaining models (Brinig and Crafton, 1994, Mc Elroy and Horney, 1981, and Lundberg and Pollak, 1996 also imply a reduction in fertility: according to these models all family decisions are made in strategic ways that depend on the enforceability of the contract and the outside opportunities of each partner.…”
Section: Divorce Laws and Fertilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the first model, the benefit of marriage is simply an exogenously given payoff that captures the extra utility couples derive from following social custom (Cohen 1987(Cohen , 2002. In the second model, marriage acts as a commitment device that fosters cooperation and/or induces partners to make relationship-specific investments (Brinig and Crafton 1994;Scott 1990Scott , 2002Wydick 2004). In the third model, the marriage contract serves as a signaling device that can be used by one partner to credibly signal his or her true love (Bishop 1984;Rowthorn 2002;Trebilcock 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Between 1968 and1977, the majority of states passed such laws, moving from a fault-based regime in which the dissolution of marriage required the mutual consent of both spouses to one in which either spouse could unilaterally file for divorce and no fault had to be proved. It has long been argued in the law and economics literature that these reforms significantly reduced the costs of exiting marriage (Bishop 1984;Brinig and Crafton 1994;Trebilcock 1999;Rowthorn 2002;Scott 1990Scott , 2002.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the beckerian tradition, Brinig and Crafton (1994) and Grossbard-Shechtman (1996) have argued that although it is not absurd to believe that changes in divorce law may have transitory consequences on the rate of divorce, it is more doubtful that those impacts prove to be persistent in the long run. The rationale is that a liberal legislation on divorce will increase the incentives for opportunistic behaviors, leading to a decrease in the gains from marriage, and finally discouraging marriage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%