1984
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.an.13.100184.000353
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Marriage Exchanges: A Melanesian Comment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 111 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in their critiques many scholars have continued to focus on the structure of dowry as an institution that has most fundamentally to do with the issue of property transmission across generations. By contrast, the present study takes as its point of departure the recognition by many scholars over the past decade that marriage exchanges do not merely valorise marriage ties or transfer property, but also act as important cultural and social institutions through which social relations are negotiated and substantialised (e.g., Barnes 1980;Collier 1988;Comaroff 1980;Smith 1987;Strathern 1984). The manner in which people talk about and manipulate marriage exchanges has not only to do with negotiations between future affines but with the negotiation of broader social relationships as well.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…However, in their critiques many scholars have continued to focus on the structure of dowry as an institution that has most fundamentally to do with the issue of property transmission across generations. By contrast, the present study takes as its point of departure the recognition by many scholars over the past decade that marriage exchanges do not merely valorise marriage ties or transfer property, but also act as important cultural and social institutions through which social relations are negotiated and substantialised (e.g., Barnes 1980;Collier 1988;Comaroff 1980;Smith 1987;Strathern 1984). The manner in which people talk about and manipulate marriage exchanges has not only to do with negotiations between future affines but with the negotiation of broader social relationships as well.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The increasing mobility of many Papua New Guineans seeking education, work and other opportunities in urban centres, has led to a rising number of marriages across different language groups, sometimes between people who have very different brideprice customs (Macintyre 2011:109–110; Rosi and Zimmer‐Tamakoshi 1993). Differences may include the types and amounts of objects exchanged, the expected timing of exchanges, the particular people who are expected to contribute to the wealth and those who will benefit from its redistribution, and so on (Merlan 1988; Strathern 1984). So called ‘mixed marriages’ can lead to significant tensions as the bride and groom and their extended families try to accommodate the demands of each side arising from different customary practices, in themselves dynamic and changing.…”
Section: An Extraordinary Weddingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, how people think about reproduction comprises an integral part of how they do it: human reproduction does not simply happen by itself, just as there is no 'automatic' biological mechanism that produces new human beings. As the history of anthropological research has documented (Strathern, 1984), reproduction is universally subjected to elaborate social control and is always modelled in a manner that parallels and complements other social structures. Consequently, fertility is always a social product as well as a biological one.…”
Section: The Sociology Of Ivfmentioning
confidence: 99%