18th AIAA Aerodynamic Decelerator Systems Technology Conference and Seminar 2005
DOI: 10.2514/6.2005-1605
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mars Exploration Rover Parachute System Performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of the expense of these tests, their like has not been attempted since. Instead, all subsequent Mars EDL systems including those planned in the foreseeable future rely on inflation qualification by similarity to the Viking design and focus on parachute strength qualification through lower-cost subsonic and static testing [17][18][19].…”
Section: B Supersonic Disk-gap-band Parachutementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the expense of these tests, their like has not been attempted since. Instead, all subsequent Mars EDL systems including those planned in the foreseeable future rely on inflation qualification by similarity to the Viking design and focus on parachute strength qualification through lower-cost subsonic and static testing [17][18][19].…”
Section: B Supersonic Disk-gap-band Parachutementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The design began with a 22 panel, 96-gore design for a 33.5 m D 0 Ringsail parachute tested as part of the 2005 Subsonic Parachute Technology Task (SPTT). 6,7 The smaller Disksail design reduces the…”
Section: B Supersonic Disksail Parachutementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Opening loads for MER-A and MER-B are likely underestimated due to the low sampling frequency (8 Hz) of the telemetered flight data [17]. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%