Dispersal is one of the least understood features in the life-history of organisms. Theoretical work concentrates on explaining dispersal of organisms in patchy and heterogeneous landscapes, but there are few predictions of dispersal patterns in stable, spatially extensive and largely homogenous landscapes, such as large forests. It is expected that we should observe short-distance dispersal in such places, that, to avoid competition with parents and siblings and incestuous mating, offspring should leave natal patches (natal dispersal), disperse independently in different directions, and move over distances that efficiently minimise the probability of meeting a sibling. Breeding dispersal should be very limited, site tenacity should prevail. To explore these ideas, I use observations of Marsh Tits Poecile palustris (a small passerine specialist of mature forests) made in the strictly protected part of the Białowie_ za National Park (Poland) over 21 years. The birds largely followed expectations: all fledglings left their natal territories and dispersed in different directions, and males moved shorter distances than females (median = 570 vs. 1,720 m). Apart from this difference, no influence of population density, fledgling time or family size was observed. No parent-offspring pairing occurred, with just one case of sibling-sibling pairing. After first breeding, individuals remained site-tenacious, as breeding dispersal distances were very short (median ca. 100 m). Such behaviour renders Marsh Tit poorly adapted to cross barriers and undertake long-distance movements, and this is actually observed in fragmented landscapes. Understanding dispersal patterns of organisms from extensive environments would be thus of value for basic and conservation science alike.
IntroductionDispersal is one of the most important, yet least understood, features of ecology, population biology and evolution (Wiens 2001). Despite numerous efforts (e.g. three edited volumes during the last decade: Clobert et al. 2001Clobert et al. , 2012 Bullock et al. 2002), we are still a long way from comprehending the phenomenon, with Clobert et al. (2012) concluding that ''despite this interest and although the importance of this particular life-history trait is widely recognized, it is perhaps understudied with its overall importance in spatial ecology''. This is mostly a consequence of the enormous difficulties of gathering observations on the movements of individuals through the landscape. Theoretical predictions cannot be tested because the data required to verify them are impossible to collect.Hopefully, with the development of new tracking technologies (e.g. Koenig et al. 1996;Meyburg and Meyburg 2009;Stutchbury et al. 2009;Bächler et al. 2010), the impediment to data collection will be gradually removed. However, there seem to be additional, and conceptual, reasons hindering progress. Theoreticians tend to treat dispersal as a unique phenomenon that could be explained with a single set of rules, in the hope of a general theory of di...