2021
DOI: 10.18187/pjsor.v17i1.3402
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Marshall–Olkin Alpha Power Lomax Distribution: Estimation Methods, Applications on Physics and Economics

Abstract: In this paper, we introduce and study a new extension of Lomax distribution with four-parameter named as the Marshall–Olkin alpha power Lomax (MOAPL) distribution. Some statistical properties of this distribution are discussed. Maximum likelihood estimation (MLE), maximum product spacing (MPS) and least Square (LS) method for the MOAPL distribution parameters are discussed. A numerical study using real data analysis and Monte-Carlo simulation are performed to compare between different methods of estimation. Su… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, we employ the MCMC technique to approximate the value of integrals in equation ( 35). Many of studies used MCMC technique such as Al-Babtain et al [25], Tolba et al [26,27], and Bantan et al [28].…”
Section: Bayesian Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, we employ the MCMC technique to approximate the value of integrals in equation ( 35). Many of studies used MCMC technique such as Al-Babtain et al [25], Tolba et al [26,27], and Bantan et al [28].…”
Section: Bayesian Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Table 6 , the TGL distribution is fitted to COVID-19 of France country. The TGL model is compared with other competitive models as Mead and Afify [ 16 ] proposed the Burr-XII model (KEBXII) with Kumaraswamy exponentiated, Weibull-Lomax (WL) distribution, Odds Exponential-Pareto IV (OEPIV) distribution proposed by Baharith et al [ 17 ], Marshall–Olkin Alpha power Weibull (MOAPW) by Almetwally et al [ 18 ], Marshall–Olkin Alpha power extended Weibull (MOAPEW) by Almetwally [ 19 ], Marshall–Olkin alpha power inverse Weibull (MOAPIW) by Basheer et al [ 20 ], Marshall–Olkin alpha power Lomax (MOAPL) by Almongy et al [ 21 ], and Gompertz Lomax (GOLOM) distribution by Oguntunde et al [ 11 ]. According to this result, we note that the estimate of TGL has the best measure where it has the smallest value of Cramer-von Mises ( W ∗ ), Anderson-Darling ( A ∗ ), and Kolmogorov- Smirnov (KS) statistic along with its P value.…”
Section: Real Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate the estimation problem of the TI I HLOF − G family parameters, this part uses six estimate methods: maximum likelihood, least-square, a maximum product of spacing, weighted least square, Cram ér-von Mises, and Anderson-Darling. For more examples see [29][30][31][32][33].…”
Section: Estimation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fourth data set is obtained from Ahmadini et al [36], it consists of 56 values of strength data measured in GPA, the single carbon fibers, and 1000 impregnated carbon fiber tows. The data are as follows: We compare the fit of the TI I HLOFW distribution with the following continuous lifetime distributions: Kumaraswamy Weibull (KW) by Cordeiro et al [37], Marshall-Olkin alpha power Weibull (MOAPW) by Almetwally [38], Marshall-Olkin alpha power inverse Weibull (MOAPIW) by Basheer et al [32], odd Perks Weibull (OPW) by Elbatal et al [14], Marshall-Olkin alpha power Lomax (MOAPL) by Almongy et al [33], and Odds exponential-Pareto IV (OWPIV) by Baharith et al [39].…”
Section: Strength Datamentioning
confidence: 99%