2014
DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2014.950561
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Marshall's versus Jacobs' Externalities in Firm Innovation Performance: The Case of French Industry

Abstract: GALLIANO D., MAGRINI M.-B. and TRIBOULET P. Marshall's versus Jacobs' externalities in firm innovation performance: the case of French industry, Regional Studies. This paper analyses the influence of different types of spatial externalities related to the location of firms on their innovation performance and how those externalities combine in the territories with regard to the Marshall-Jacobs dichotomy. The originality of this study also lies in the consideration of a larger definition of the firm, one that ta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(36 reference statements)
2
26
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…There is a long-lasting debate in the literature whether Jacobs or MAR externalities exists and under which circumstances they foster innovative performance of regions or individual companies (for an overview see Beaudry and Schiffauerova 2009). In comparable contexts of SMEs, MAR externalities enhancing innovation have been observed to be more important than Jacobs externalities (van der Panne 2004; Galliano et al 2015). We therefore expected to see similar results in this study.…”
Section: Variables and Measuressupporting
confidence: 58%
“…There is a long-lasting debate in the literature whether Jacobs or MAR externalities exists and under which circumstances they foster innovative performance of regions or individual companies (for an overview see Beaudry and Schiffauerova 2009). In comparable contexts of SMEs, MAR externalities enhancing innovation have been observed to be more important than Jacobs externalities (van der Panne 2004; Galliano et al 2015). We therefore expected to see similar results in this study.…”
Section: Variables and Measuressupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Externalities of proximity (Galliano et al 2015) can also attract new firms, in particular SMEs (Kuah 2002) to join the cluster, facilitated by the low entrybarriers. All these features concur to favor a better matching between demand and supply (the user-producer relations, by Lundvall 1985), facilitating product and process' improvement, contributing to boost an environment favorable to innovation (Feldman 1994).…”
Section: Diffusion Of Innovation and Clusteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because, first, during the development process of specialized agglomeration from formation through growth to maturation, resources allocation is continuously optimized in a cluster; the knowledge and technology spillover resulting from manufacturing agglomerations can promote technological progress. This may stimulate enterprises in agglomeration regions to adopt more advanced, environmentally friendly production technologies, which can effectively reduce pollutant emissions (Baomin et al, 2012;Pessoa, 2014;Galliano et al, 2015) [71][72][73]. Second, the production activities of the same industry within a specialized cluster typically generate the same or similar pollutants; therefore, public pollution control facilities can realize specialized operations and create a scale effect (Berliant, 2013;Costantini, 2014) [74,75].…”
Section: Results Of the Panel Threshold Regressionmentioning
confidence: 99%