2002
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.66.054428
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Martensitic transition and magnetoresistance in a Cu-Al-Mn shape-memory alloy: Influence of ageing

Abstract: We have studied the effect of ageing within the miscibility gap on the electric, magnetic, and thermodynamic properties of a nonstoichiometric Heusler Cu-Al-Mn shape-memory alloy, which undergoes a martensitic transition from a bcc-based structure (␤ phase͒ towards a close-packed structure (M phase͒. Negative magnetoresistance that shows an almost linear dependence on the square of magnetization with different slopes in the M and ␤ phases was observed. This magnetoresistive effect has been associated with the … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Through this mechanism, the sample tracks its thermal history; this memory has an eminently structural character, displaying features similar to the shape memory effect found in other systems [16].…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Through this mechanism, the sample tracks its thermal history; this memory has an eminently structural character, displaying features similar to the shape memory effect found in other systems [16].…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…[14] reported MR of Ni 2 MnGe and Ni 2 MnGa films on GaAs(001) to be ≈ 1% at 9 T at 280 K. Non-stoichiometric Cu-Al-Mn shape memory Heusler alloy shows a large negative MR of 7% at 5 T at 10 K, but at 250 K it is only 0.5%. [15] In half-Heusler alloys like NiMnSb and PtMnSb, the reported MR values at 295 K and 8 T are ≈1% and ≈2.5%, respectively and are attributed to the inelastic s-d scattering. [16] The polycrystalline ingots of Ni 2+x Mn 1−x Ga for x = 0, 0.1 and 0.2 were prepared by standard method [11] and have been characterized by x-ray diffraction (XRD), energy dispersive x-ray analysis (EDAX), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), resistivity, ac magnetic susceptibility, magnetization and photoelectron spectroscopy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method provides vs. curves with the same shape as those obtained by directly measuring vs. under continuous heating at different constant values of . However, the latter can yield slightly different values for the transition temperature due to uncontrollable metastability effects occurring during thermal cycling through the [10]. A number of interesting features are seen from Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%