1977
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-15801-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Marx and the Third World

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although adherents of Marx may find some of his comments lacking in respect, or veneration, Voget is never cheap or chiding. On the contrary; his characterization of Marxism as being basically a form of unilinear evolutionism, one experiencing difficulties in finding a solution for the complex relations between evolutionary theory and historical processes, exposes a problem that today still hounds Marxist anthropologists, who in various ways have tried to cope with these difficulties (e.g., Khazanov 1971Khazanov , 1974Melotti 1977 social structure is excellent. It is, therefore, regrettable that he does not inform the reader how Marxist-oriented anthropologists apply these views in their work.…”
Section: Reviews In Anthropology / Fall 1981mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Although adherents of Marx may find some of his comments lacking in respect, or veneration, Voget is never cheap or chiding. On the contrary; his characterization of Marxism as being basically a form of unilinear evolutionism, one experiencing difficulties in finding a solution for the complex relations between evolutionary theory and historical processes, exposes a problem that today still hounds Marxist anthropologists, who in various ways have tried to cope with these difficulties (e.g., Khazanov 1971Khazanov , 1974Melotti 1977 social structure is excellent. It is, therefore, regrettable that he does not inform the reader how Marxist-oriented anthropologists apply these views in their work.…”
Section: Reviews In Anthropology / Fall 1981mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This latter would in its turn reinforce the Russian, rendering possible its advance to socialism by-passing capitalism and on the basis of a regenerated mir or communal farming system. 5 While the Bolshevik perspective was preponderantly focused on a Western European revolution, there were occasional hints of a different outlook. This was particularly evident in an article by Lenin entitled ''Backward Europe and Advanced Asia,'' in which he argued that contrary to the conventional notion of a backward Asia and an advanced Europe, Asia was in fact more advanced in that the bourgeoisie was still fighting against imperialism and feudalism*and therefore continued to have a progressive character*while in Europe the bourgeoisie no longer played any such role and had therefore lost all vestige of progressivism.…”
Section: The Leninist Problematiquementioning
confidence: 98%
“…It is important to avoid reading these levels as necessary stages of progression through which societies must go (Marx, 1852(Marx, /1974aMelotti, 1977). Nevertheless, it is also important to recognize that the extent and intensity of the social division of labor in a society has profound effects on daily life.…”
Section: Appropriation Of Affordances 151mentioning
confidence: 98%