Marx's Temporalities

Tomba, Massimiliano

doi:10.1163/9789004236790

Cited by 126 publications

(29 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Massimiliano Tomba (2012: 175) has used the metaphor of geological layers to draw attention to the ways in which logics can develop at different paces. This is developed as a challenge to linear, sequential models in which there is a coordinated change between logics.…”

Section: Christopher Uggen and Howard Erlanger Show How Grievance Promentioning

confidence: 99%

Practice, Substance, and History: Reframing Institutional Logics

Mutch

2018

AMR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Christopher Uggen and Howard Erlanger Show How Grievance Promentioning

confidence: 99%

Practice, Substance, and History: Reframing Institutional Logics

Mutch

2018

AMR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…In this passage, Bensaïd echoes Benjamin in developing a Marxism without guarantees that depends on going against the grain of history and creatively drawing on non‐synchronous times. We might understand this today in light of Harry Harootunian (), Tomba () and other recent interpretations of Marx's distinction between real and formal subsumption. For the purposes of understanding Bensaïd, the main point is that although capital attempts to subsume everything under its own temporal order, it inevitably fails and we are left with a world of heterogenous temporalities that are often overlooked.…”

Section: Enzo Traverso and The Political Efficacy Of Melancholiamentioning

confidence: 92%

Conjuring hope out of leftist melancholy: Thinking through recent scholarship on neoliberalism and the legacy of socialism

Murthy

2018

Journal of Labor and Society

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

while asking about the legacy of socialism in the current neoliberal moment. Traverso's Leftist Melancholia traces how leftists went from being melancholic about the future to giving up on the socialist project. Bockman's Markets Against Socialism attempts to infuse hope into our present by uncovering the concealed history of the role of markets in actually existing socialism and in the formation of neo-liberalism. She contends that neo-liberalism effaced any trace of such a history, which could point the way beyond capitalism. Wang Hui brings a different perspective by theorizing from the global south and from China in particular. He consequently highlights the problems of imperialism and class in twentieth century socialist history. As I articulate the arguments of these three books, I draw on recent Marxist theorists, such as Moishe Postone and Jacques Bidet to construct a theory of capitalism that can make sense of the problems and possibilities associated with our global capitalist present. In short, I argue that theories of socialism must highlight the potential of class and anti-imperialist struggles by placing them within the larger vortex of capitalist and state dynamics. | IN TRO DUCT IO NThe emergence of neo-liberalism and the end of the Cold War have caused the left to be both traumatized and often bereft of compelling explanatory narratives. Many would agree that some type of shift took place around the 1970s and 1980s, but clear explanations of how and why neo-liberalism arose are not easy to find. Moreover, the emergence of neo-liberalism overlapped with the crises of socialism and the end of the Cold-War in Euro-America, which caused a world-wide loss of hope for any alternative beyond capitalism. Given the overlap between neo-liberalism and the crises of melancholia of the left after the Cold War, I decided to read Enzo Traverso's Left-Wing Melancholia, Johanna Bockman's

show abstract

“…Jedną z nich dostarcza nam Massimiliano Tomba, każący śledzić różne czasowości, które dopiero w kolejnym kroku są synchronizowane przez kapitał (Tomba 2013). Jeden liniowy czas historii A, historii 1., jest więc czasem panujących (Bednarek 2015, Krzeski 2015.…”

Section: Uwaga Metodologiczna: Konserwatywna Mitologia Republikanizmuunclassified

Polityczność metodologii a polityczność przedrewolucji. Tocqueville, emancypacja i krytyka konserwatywnej historiografii

Klimont¹

2017

10.14746/prt

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstrakt: Artykuł stanowi próbę krytyki mechanizmów konserwatywnej historiografii na przykładzie wybranych dyskusji w obrębie historii społecznej dotyczących ostatnich lat ancien régime'u. Współczesne spory historyków i historyczek zostają zanalizowane pod kątem metodologicznym i pojęciowym. Celem artykułu jest ufilozoficznienie problemów przypisanych do pola historycznego oraz rozpoznanie ich stawek politycznych. Efektem tych analiz jest wypracowanie bardziej uniwersalnych schematów krytyki narracji konserwatywnej w historiografii oraz przedstawienie paru wskazówek do pisania interdyscyplinarnej historiografii emancypacyjnej, która twórczo czerpałaby z tradycji lewicowej makrohistorii, filozoficznych krytyk historii i historii oddolnej.Słowa kluczowe: rewolucja francuska, Tocqueville, Walter Benjamin, metodologia historii, historia oddolna

show abstract

Marx's Temporalities

Cited by 126 publications

References 0 publications

Practice, Substance, and History: Reframing Institutional Logics

Practice, Substance, and History: Reframing Institutional Logics

Conjuring hope out of leftist melancholy: Thinking through recent scholarship on neoliberalism and the legacy of socialism

Polityczność metodologii a polityczność przedrewolucji. Tocqueville, emancypacja i krytyka konserwatywnej historiografii

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About