Mary Versus Eve: Paternal Uncertainty and the Christian View of Women

Abstract

By Vladimir TumanovWestern University AbstractThe Virgin Mary and Eve constitute two opposite sexual poles in the way Christian discourse has approached women since the time of the church fathers. This stems from a predicament faced by the human male throughout hominid evolution, namely, paternal uncertainty. Because the male is potentially always at risk of unwittingly raising the offspring of another male, two (often complementary) male sexual strategies have evolved to counter this genetic threat: mate guarding and promiscuity. The Virgin Mary is the mythological expression of the mate guarding strategy. Mary is an eternal virgin, symbolically allaying all fear of paternal uncertainty. Mary makes it possible for the male psyche to have its reproductive cake and eat it too: she gives birth (so reproduction takes place) and yet requires no mate guarding effort or jealousy. Eve, the inventor of female sexuality, is repeatedly viewed by the church fathers, e.g., Augustine and Origen, as Mary's opposite. Thus, Eve becomes the embodiment of the whore: both attractive in the context of the promiscuity strategy and repulsive in terms of paternal uncertainty: "Death by Eve, life by Mary" (St. Jerome). The Mary-Eve dichotomy has given a conceptual basis to what is known in psychology as the Madonna-Whore dichotomy: the tendency to categorize women in terms of two polar opposites. This paper will explore the way mythology reflects biology, i.e., human psychological traits that have evolved over millennia.

‘Shameful histories’ – shame and sex perceived by secondary school students in history education

“…According to feminist research about shame and its connection to the patriarchy, shame is internalised to regulate Others and their sexuality, implying that the Othered has failed in some way according to norms (Ahmed, 2014;Bartky, 1990;Christianson et al, 2021;Munt, 2008). Shame is also intertwined with historical/traditional and religious norms for women's sexuality through the recurring and thoroughly analysed Madonna-whore dichotomy; this dichotomy essentially leaves two positions available for women, as either good/chaste or bad/promiscuous (Bareket et al, 2018;Conrad, 2006;Kahalon et al, 2019;Tumanov, 2011). Even though this is connected to Christianity, similar norms are found in all Abrahamic religions (Kretschmer et al, 2024;Saharso et al, 2023).…”

La mujer política en Twitter: análisis de los mensajes emitidos por las candidatas a gubernaturas en México

“…Estos resultados concuerdan con evidencia previa en estudios sobre la representación de la mujer tanto en los medios tradicionales como digitales, las cuales muestran que la mujer se presenta vinculada a las cuestiones emocionales y al aspecto íntimo o privado (Digón, 2006;Galán, 2007;Plakoyinaki, Mathioudaki y Dimitratos, 2008;Tumanov, 2011;Valls y Martínez, 2007). Particularmente Álvarez (2017) encontró que de la mujer en la política suelen resaltarse situaciones personales.…”

Purity, presumed displeasure and piety in the ‘big three’: a critical analysis of magazine discourse on young women's sexuality

“…While scholarly conceptualizations of sexuality have become ever more complex acknowledging a wide spectrum of differences in actions and desires, popular culture is still heavily influenced by more traditional notions of sexuality. The new millennium saw the emergence of two 'new' cultural discourses in pop culture that mirror the classic virgin/whore dichotomy (Tumanov, 2011): 'girls gone wild' and 'new virgins'.…”