Masalah Definisi dan Delimitasi Antariksa

Abstract

Masalah definisi dan delimitasi antariksa mulai dibahas pada sidang United Nations AdHoc Committee for the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space tahun 1959, namun sampai dengan sidang tahun 2016 tidak dapat diselesaikan dan disepakati, sehingga tetap menjadi agenda sidang pada tahun selanjutnya. Tulisan ini dengan menggunakan metode historis dan yuridis normatif akan menganalisis tentang kecenderungan pengaturan masalah definisi dan delimitasi antariksa, serta posisi Indonesia terhadap masalah tersebut. Berdasarkan hasil analisis ada kecenderungan bahwa pengaturan masalah definisi dan delimitasi antariksa akan diselesaikan dengan mengatur secara khusus jenis atau fungsi teknologi wahana tertentu atau pendekatan fungsional yang bersifat spesifik. Sedangkan posisi Indonesia pada awalnya cenderung berubah-ubah dengan menyatakan bahwa ada batas spasial yang sesuai dengan kesepakatan internasional. Semenjak disahkannya UndangUndang Nomor 21 tahun 2013 tentang Keantariksaan secara tegas menyatakan pendekatan spasial. Jika dibandingkan antara kecenderiungan internasional dan posisi Indonesia mencerminkan perbedaan mendasar yang signifikan.

Local Government’s Integrity and Strategy in Tourism Development Based on Creative Economy in Kerinci Regency

“…This research is descriptive with a qualitative approach that aims to address the problems described in the research problem formulation. According to Sugiono [9], descriptive research aims to describe the reality of the events under study so that researchers are able to obtain objective data in order to develop a creative economy-based tourism development strategy to improve the economy of the local community. Population and Sample Sugiono [10] explained that the population is the whole of the subjects studied while the sample is part or representative of the population under study.…”

Architectural Heritage Analysis of the Yuanying Guan Pavilion: Construction and Signification

“…As for Peirce, he adopted the triadic model [4] (pp. [29][30][31][32]. This model comprises the signifier element, the signified, and a third component called the object.…”

“…Regarding the deep level [30] (p. 6), the relationship between form and meaning shows that the function of a building is not only that which concerns the architect, but also the appropriation of an idea expressed by a set of actors Consequently, the exterior of the building can transmit different signs that can be interpreted by an observer in different ways. Yuanying Guan was a pavilion built as a viewing place from its inner throne, but it could be interpreted as a Taoist temple or as an administrative building of the imperial court.…”