Masked Repetition and Phonological Priming Within and Across Modalities.

Grainger, Jonathan; Diependaele, Kevin; Spinelli, Elsa; Ferrand, Ludovic; Farioli, Fernand

doi:10.1037/0278-7393.29.6.1256

Cited by 94 publications

(140 citation statements)

References 51 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

123

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…This claim is made by Perfetti and colleagues (e.g., Perfetti, Bell, & Delaney, 1988;Xu & Perfetti, 1999;Zhang, Perfetti, & Yang, 1999), Frost and colleagues (e.g., Gronau & Frost, 1997;Frost, 1998;2003), Grainger and colleagues (e.g., Ferrand & Grainger, 1992;Grainger, Diependaele, Spinelli, Ferrand, & Farioli, 2003), and Van Orden and colleagues (e.g., Van Orden, Pennington, & Stone, 1990;Ziegler, Van Orden, & Jacobs, 1997), among others (Brysbaert, 2001;Catena, Fuentes, & Tudela, 2002;Johnston & Castles, 2003;Lukatela Recoding & Turvey, 1994;Luo, Johnson, & Gallo, 1998). For example, Xu and Perfetti (1999) argue for "rapid automatic phonological activation, independent of stimulus based processing strategies" (p. 26).…”

Section: Phonological Recodingmentioning

confidence: 91%

Reading aloud is not automatic: Processing capacity is required to generate a phonological code from print.

Reynolds¹,

Besner²

2006

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Perfor

100

119

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ii I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis. This is a true copy of the thesis, including any required final revisions, as accepted by my examiners.I understand that my thesis may be made electronically available to the public.iii AbstractThe process of generating a phonological code from print is widely described asautomatic. This claim is tested in Chapter 1 by assessing whether phonological recoding uses central attention in the context of the Psychological Refractory Period (PRP) paradigm. Task 1 was a tone discrimination task and Task 2 was reading aloud.Nonword letter length and grapheme-phoneme complexity yielded additive effects with SOA in Experiments 1 and 2 suggesting that assembled phonology uses central attention. Theoretical development in this field (and others) will be facilitated by abandoning the idea that skilled performance inevitably means that all the underlying processes are automatic.iv Acknowledgements

show abstract

Section: Phonological Recodingmentioning

confidence: 91%

Reading aloud is not automatic: Processing capacity is required to generate a phonological code from print.

Reynolds¹,

Besner²

2006

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Perfor

100

119

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Figure 4 provides a tentative outline of these component processes and their possible interactions. The visual word recognition part of Figure 4 is taken from the bimodal interactive activation (BIA) model (Diependaele, Ziegler, & Grainger, in press;Grainger, Diependaele, Spinelli, Ferrand, & Farioli, 2003;Grainger & Ziegler, 2007;. Visual features map onto prelexical orthographic representations (not shown), which then map onto whole-word orthographic representations (O words) along the direct pathway to semantics and onto wholeword phonological representations (P words).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Primed picture naming within and across languages: An ERP investigation

Chauncey

Holcomb

Grainger

2009

Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In two experiments, while event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded, participants named picture targets that were preceded by masked word primes that corresponded either to the name of the picture target or to an unrelated picture name. Experiment 1 showed significant priming effects in the ERP waveforms, free from articulator artifact, starting as early as 200 msec post target onset. Possible loci of these priming effects were proposed within the framework of generic interactive activation models of word recognition and picture naming. These were grouped into three main components: object-specific structural representations, amodal semantic representations, and word-specific phonological and articulatory representations. Experiment 2 provided an initial test of the possible role of each of these components by comparing within-language repetition priming with priming from translation equivalents in bilingual participants. The early and widespread effects of noncognate translation primes in L1 on picture naming in L2 point to object-specific and amodal semantic representations as the principal loci of priming effects obtained with masked word primes and picture targets.

show abstract

“…Although we aimed to account for this variance by introducing the control variable, residual measurement errors cannot be excluded. Given their more abstract origin, semantic transparency effects might be more vulnerable to this kind of noise (including noise from erroneous Grainger et al, 2003). These masks can induce stronger interference with the initial form encoding of primes than is usually the case when there is no backward masking (e.g., as in Forster & Davis, 1984).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Finally, Experiments 1 and 2 not only tested visual masked priming, but also masked cross-modal priming with visual primes and auditory targets (Grainger, Diependaele, Spinelli, Ferrand, & Farioli, 2003;Kouider & Dupoux, 2001). Our prior research (Diependaele et al, 2005) revealed that cross-modal transfer is effective with respect to morpho-orthographic activation in the case of suffixed words.…”

Section: Experiments 1 Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%