2018
DOI: 10.1049/iet-bmt.2018.5012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Masked SIFT with align‐based refinement for contactless palmprint recognition

Abstract: Contactless palmprint is considered more user convenient than other biometrics due to its acquisition simplicity and less-private nature. Many challenges arise which affect the performance of common contact-based methods when applied to a contactless environment. For example, pose and illumination variations affect the layout and visibility of palm lines. This study proposes a SIFT-based method with three main modifications from the traditional SIFT. First, the palm regions with no significant lines/wrinkles a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 46 publications
(111 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Feature extraction directly affects the discriminative ability of the palmprint recognition. In recent years, different features are extracted with several state‐of‐the‐art methods, such as subspace features [11–13], statistical features [14–16], geometrical features [17, 18]. When the feature size is large, effective dimensionality reduction technologies, including subspace technologies, can reduce the storage cost and computational complexity of matching.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feature extraction directly affects the discriminative ability of the palmprint recognition. In recent years, different features are extracted with several state‐of‐the‐art methods, such as subspace features [11–13], statistical features [14–16], geometrical features [17, 18]. When the feature size is large, effective dimensionality reduction technologies, including subspace technologies, can reduce the storage cost and computational complexity of matching.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%