2007
DOI: 10.1122/1.2764089
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mason numbers for magnetorheology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
110
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
8
110
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was the basic assumption in that paper [20]. However, for the static case the interaction was stronger.…”
Section: Static and Dynamic Yield Stressmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This was the basic assumption in that paper [20]. However, for the static case the interaction was stronger.…”
Section: Static and Dynamic Yield Stressmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…There is an alternative relation to the fit. According to Klingenberg et al [20], a better fit can be observed when H is replaced by M and it is applicable to wide range of M. This is plotted in Fig. 9, with both types of τ and M values calculated from powder magnetization data (M-H curves, vide Fig.…”
Section: Static and Dynamic Yield Stressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a simple shear flow, the local velocity in this relation is where is the shear rate. The dimensionless ratio of the magnetic force to the hydrodynamic force results in the Mason number (Marshall et al, 1989 (for equivalent problem in ER fluids), Klingenberg et al, 2007) .…”
Section: Submitted To the Journal Of Intelligent Materials Systems Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The magnetic force generated between two particles placed in a homogeneous field can be viewed as arising from the distorted field lines of each magnetically susceptible particle. This interparticle force for the case of two spherical particles in contact is (Klingenberg et al, 2007)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation