Lecture Notes in Computer Science
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-76929-3_21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Masquerade Detection Based Upon GUI User Profiling in Linux Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, their detection rate was not impressive. [2] designed a logger in the KDE environment. The disadvantages of their work were that they collected data only from a single window and did not consider the complexity of profiling multi applications.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, their detection rate was not impressive. [2] designed a logger in the KDE environment. The disadvantages of their work were that they collected data only from a single window and did not consider the complexity of profiling multi applications.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from command‐based masquerade detection, some researchers 27–29 investigate GUI analysis for masquerade detection. But, in this paper we concentrate on masquerade detection based on UNIX command data.…”
Section: Masquerade Detection Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some researchers used Schonlau dataset to detect intrusion attacks using various techniques [5]. There also exists a lot of research work in the area of masquerade detection, which is a specific case of anomaly-based intrusion detection [3,4,9,17].…”
Section: Intrusion Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these techniques are not directly applicable to modern GUI-based systems, where typical user activities include mouse movements and keystrokes. Thus, command line data alone cannot efficiently detect intrusion attacks on such systems [4].…”
Section: Chapter 1 Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation