2012
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/757/1/4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mass and Environment as Drivers of Galaxy Evolution. Ii. The Quenching of Satellite Galaxies as the Origin of Environmental Effects

Abstract: We extend the phenomenological study of the evolving galaxy population of Peng et al. (2010) to the central/satellite dichotomy in Yang et al. Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) groups. We find that satellite galaxies are responsible for all the environmental effects in our earlier work. The fraction of centrals that are red does not depend on their environment but only on their stellar masses, whereas that of the satellites depends on both. We define a relative satellite quenching efficiency ε sat , which is the… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

82
596
7

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 429 publications
(685 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
82
596
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter may instead be more strongly influenced by internal quenching processes (as stellar or AGN feedback). This agrees roughly with results by Peng et al (2012) who show that quiescent fractions of low mass galaxies are mainly dependent on den- Figure 10. Mean radial distance versus the 1 Mpc density for satellites in different stellar mass bins (different panels) in observations (symbols) and models (lines with shaded areas).…”
Section: The Dependence Of the Quiescent Satellite Fraction Onsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The latter may instead be more strongly influenced by internal quenching processes (as stellar or AGN feedback). This agrees roughly with results by Peng et al (2012) who show that quiescent fractions of low mass galaxies are mainly dependent on den- Figure 10. Mean radial distance versus the 1 Mpc density for satellites in different stellar mass bins (different panels) in observations (symbols) and models (lines with shaded areas).…”
Section: The Dependence Of the Quiescent Satellite Fraction Onsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…These studies also highlight -even if using different density estimators -a strong density dependence of the quiescent satellite fractions at a given stellar mass. In contrast, for the density dependence of quiescent central galaxies, the situation is less clear: Peng et al (2012) and Kovač (2014) find no significant density dependence on top of the stellar mass dependence, while the quiescent fractions of low mass centrals depend, albeit weakly, on density in the study of Woo et al (2013). These differences may be ascribed to different estimators for quiescence (e.g.…”
Section: Comparison Of Our Observational Results To Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The parent vs. satellite nature of a galaxy (cf. Berlind et al 2005;Tinker et al 2012) is envisioned to be key to explaining some critical observations (Peng et al 2012; Knobel et al 2013). However, disentangling the physics involved is complicated greatly by the different degrees to which environment correlates with various galaxy properties, such as morphology and color (Blanton et al 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%