2017
DOI: 10.1109/tla.2017.7854623
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mass and Volume Estimation of Passion Fruit using Digital Images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The estimation of mass of a mango fruit on-tree from lineal dimensions is prone to greater error than for a circular-symmetric fruit, given the variation in mango fruit width in different orientations. Thus, while the RMSE on estimation of fruit lineal dimension in this study (4.7 mm) (Table 8) was comparable to that achieved in other studies and other fruit, e.g., 4.9 mm RMSE for mango length [9] and 5.1 mm RMSE for apple diameter at 40% visibility of fruit surface [6], the RMSE on estimation of mass was large, at 113 g, compared to that for axi-symmetric fruit, e.g., 18 g for tomato [23] and 15.5 g or for passion fruit [30]. Authors of [31] reported 95 and 96.7% accuracy on mass estimates for carrot and cucumber, respectively.…”
Section: Fruit Weight Estimationsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The estimation of mass of a mango fruit on-tree from lineal dimensions is prone to greater error than for a circular-symmetric fruit, given the variation in mango fruit width in different orientations. Thus, while the RMSE on estimation of fruit lineal dimension in this study (4.7 mm) (Table 8) was comparable to that achieved in other studies and other fruit, e.g., 4.9 mm RMSE for mango length [9] and 5.1 mm RMSE for apple diameter at 40% visibility of fruit surface [6], the RMSE on estimation of mass was large, at 113 g, compared to that for axi-symmetric fruit, e.g., 18 g for tomato [23] and 15.5 g or for passion fruit [30]. Authors of [31] reported 95 and 96.7% accuracy on mass estimates for carrot and cucumber, respectively.…”
Section: Fruit Weight Estimationsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…At present, there are many automated systems based semiconductor sensor devices have been developed [9]- [13]. In agriculture industry, such technology is used to simplify the process for instance, nutrient prob [14] loose fruit picking machines [15], [16] and fruit sorting machines [17]- [19]. This automated system is powered by a microcontroller and Arduino.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mass and volume predictions from easily determined physical attributes may facilitate design and operation of post-harvest sorting machines and processes (Gonzalez et al 2017). Several researchers indicated that machine learning algorithms yielded better outcomes for prediction of fruit characteristics than the conventional methods (Moosavi and Sepaskha 2012;Demir et al 2017;Kus et al 2017;Shabani et al 2017;Çetin et al 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%