2020
DOI: 10.1111/ejss.13005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mass‐balance approach to quantify water distribution in soils based on X‐ray computed tomography images

Abstract: X‐ray computed tomography (CT) is commonly used in soil science to quantify distributions of pores, water and solids within soil samples. Particularly promising for liquid visualization is dual‐energy scanning of samples with added dopant solutions. The approach uses solutions of heavy elements as a proxy for the soil water and utilizes the abrupt increase of the mass attenuation coefficient of heavy elements when crossing an X‐ray absorption edge, detectable by dual‐energy CT scanning. However, a key step in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We employed multi-energy X-ray computed tomography (µCT) scanning to visualize the specific locations of and volumes occupied by the liquids added to pores of different sizes. Specifically, to characterize the distributions of glucose solutions when added to the cores, three intact mini-cores (8 mm Ø and 5 mm height) were subjected to multi-energy X-ray µCT scanning after adding the dopant solutions (10% KI and 10% BaCl 2 ) to the small and large soil pores 104 . Since glucose at the concentrations used in this study does not precipitate and the water-glucose solution has a similar viscosity to the KI and BaCl 2 solutions, we assume that the distribution of glucose in soil pores does not differ significantly from those for the dopant solutions when applied in the same volumes and at the same matrix potentials.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We employed multi-energy X-ray computed tomography (µCT) scanning to visualize the specific locations of and volumes occupied by the liquids added to pores of different sizes. Specifically, to characterize the distributions of glucose solutions when added to the cores, three intact mini-cores (8 mm Ø and 5 mm height) were subjected to multi-energy X-ray µCT scanning after adding the dopant solutions (10% KI and 10% BaCl 2 ) to the small and large soil pores 104 . Since glucose at the concentrations used in this study does not precipitate and the water-glucose solution has a similar viscosity to the KI and BaCl 2 solutions, we assume that the distribution of glucose in soil pores does not differ significantly from those for the dopant solutions when applied in the same volumes and at the same matrix potentials.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We employed multi-energy X-ray computed tomography (µCT) scanning to visualize the specific locations of and volumes occupied by the liquids added to pores of different sizes. Specifically, to characterize the distributions of glucose solutions when added to the cores, three intact mini-cores (8 mm Ø and 5 mm height) were subjected to multi-energy X-ray µCT scanning after adding the dopant solutions (10% KI and 10% BaCl2) to the small and large soil pores 68 . Since glucose at the concentrations used in this study does not precipitate and the waterglucose solution has a similar viscosity to the KI and BaCl2 solutions, we assume that the distribution of glucose in soil pores does not differ significantly from those for the dopant solutions when applied in the same volumes and at the same matrix potentials.…”
Section: 3x-ray Computed Micro-tomography (µCt) Scanningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Segmentation of images (i.e., separation of pore space from solids) has been and remains a necessary preprocessing operation before any study of scale dependencies at the pore or aggregate scale. This operation with X‐ray CT imagery can lead to additional uncertainty, especially if parts of the pore space are filled with loose organic material (Gerke & Karsanina, 2020) or include incompletely saturated pores (Guber, Kutlu, Rivers, & Kravchenko, 2020). The latter authors proposed an elegant solution for the segmentation problem based on saturating the soil sample with a salt solution that exhibits an abrupt and notable change of the mass attenuation coefficient at the threshold level of the beam energy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%