Mass cardiopulmonary resuscitation 99 – survey results of a multi-organisational effort in public education in cardiopulmonary resuscitation

Fong, Yuke Tien; Anantharaman, Venkataraman; Lim, Swee Han; Leong, KW; Pokkan, Gopalan

doi:10.1016/s0300-9572(01)00312-4

Cited by 29 publications

(18 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…148,202,203 Common reasons for not learning CPR include • lack of time or interest • inconvenience of having to leave the house • cost • inability to find a course • bad health or physical limitations • fear of contracting HIV • fear of being sued. 6,81,112,152,199,[204][205][206] While no CPR provider has ever been successfully sued, 207,208 failure to provide support could have legal con-sequences. 209 We have descriptive evidence that modifiable factors exist and influence the knowledge translation of CPR skills in the community (Class II-3), but little is known about how to modify behaviour.…”

Section: Where Should Cpr Instructions Be Given?mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…3 Unfortunately, bystander CPR rates have remained low over the past decade, rarely exceeding 20%. 2,4 Various attempts have been made in the past to improve bystander CPR rates, including • the organization of mass CPR training events [5][6][7][8][9][10] • CPR training of family members of patients suffering from heart disease [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] • promotional CPR videos 19,[23][24][25] • CPR training of high school students. 24,[26][27][28][29] None of these initiatives have succeeded in significantly improving bystander CPR or survival rates for out-ofhospital cardiac arrest.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Understanding and improving low bystander CPR rates: a systematic review of the literature

Vaillancourt

Stiell

Wells

2008

CJEM

143

110

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is a crucial yet weak link in the chain of survival for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. We sought to understand the determinants of bystander CPR and the factors associated with successful training. Methods: For this systematic review, we searched 11 electronic databases, 1 trial registry and 9 scientific websites. We performed hand searches and contacted 6 content experts. We reviewed without restriction all communications pertaining to who should learn CPR, what should be taught, when to repeat training, where to give CPR instructions and why people lack the motivation to learn and perform CPR. We used standardized forms to review papers for inclusion, quality and data extraction. We grouped publications by category and classified recommendations using a standardized classification system that was based on level of evidence. Results: We reviewed 2409 articles and selected 411 for complete evaluation. We included 252 of the 411 papers in this systematic review. Differences in their study design precluded a meta-analysis. We classified 22 recommendations; those with the highest scores were 1) 9-1-1 dispatchassisted CPR instructions, 2) teaching CPR to family members of cardiac patients, 3) Braslow's selftraining video, 4) maximizing time spent using manikins and 5) teaching the concepts of ambiguity and diffusion of responsibility. Recommendations not supported by evidence include mass training events, pulse taking prior to CPR by laymen and CPR using chest compressions alone. Conclusion:We evaluated and classified the potential impact of interventions that have been proposed to improve bystander CPR rates. Our results may help communities design interventions to improve their bystander CPR rates. RÉSUMÉ Objectifs : La réanimation cardio-respiratoire (RCR) est un maillon essentiel, quoique faible, de la chaîne de survie lors de la survenue d'un arrêt cardiaque hors de l'hôpital. Nous avons cherché à comprendre les déterminants du taux de passants pouvant administrer la RCR et les facteurs liés à une formation efficace. Méthodes : Dans le cadre de cette revue systématique, nous avons analysé 11 bases de données électroniques, un registre d'essais cliniques et neuf sites Web scientifiques. Nous avons réalisé des recherches manuelles et communiqué avec six experts du contenu. Nous avons examiné sans restriction toutes les communications portant sur les questions suivantes : qui devrait apprendre la RCR, ce qu'on devrait enseigner, QUAND la formation devrait être renouvelée, où les cours de

show abstract

Section: Where Should Cpr Instructions Be Given?mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Understanding and improving low bystander CPR rates: a systematic review of the literature

Vaillancourt

Stiell

Wells

2008

CJEM

143

110

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Various educational courses conformed to Guidelines 2000 for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and cardiovascular care: international consensus on science (G2000) were held, including the mass CPR training events [6], targeted CPR training of family members of patients suffering from cardiovascular disease [7]. In Japan, new driver license applicants have been forced to take the 3-hour BLS training course at driving school since 1995.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The effects of the new CPR guideline on attitude toward basic life support in Japan

Enami¹,

Takei²,

Goto³

et al. 2010

Resuscitation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…55 Traditional methods to increase CPR have used generic training programs that are employment-, school-, or eventbased. 30,[56][57][58] However, these approaches to CPR training have not been as successful in US communities of blacks, Latinos, those with limited English proficiency, and the poor-all groups with a high incidence of OHCA and low survival. 36,[43][44][45][46] Traditional CPR training approaches may not be as successful in these populations because they do not target groups based on needs and are not tailored to these specific social or cultural groups.…”

Section: The Role Of Geographic Information Systems In Public Health mentioning

confidence: 99%

Increasing Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Provision in Communities With Low Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Rates

Sasson¹,

Meischke²,

Abella³

et al. 2013

Circulation

128

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Mass cardiopulmonary resuscitation 99 – survey results of a multi-organisational effort in public education in cardiopulmonary resuscitation

Cited by 29 publications

References 7 publications

Understanding and improving low bystander CPR rates: a systematic review of the literature

Understanding and improving low bystander CPR rates: a systematic review of the literature

The effects of the new CPR guideline on attitude toward basic life support in Japan

Increasing Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Provision in Communities With Low Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Rates

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About