1974
DOI: 10.1080/10948007409489285
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mass Communication Law

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(pp. 7,8) Justice Clark in Estes specifically mentioned witness testimony (see page 9 of this study) as one of four areas of interest regarding televised trials (Gillmor, 1974, pp. 456-458).…”
Section: Witness Testimonymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…(pp. 7,8) Justice Clark in Estes specifically mentioned witness testimony (see page 9 of this study) as one of four areas of interest regarding televised trials (Gillmor, 1974, pp. 456-458).…”
Section: Witness Testimonymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…CHAFEE, supra note 40, at 22. Donald Gillmor and Melanie Grant adopt an even more extreme position and contend that civil libel's rare 233 and "now generally discouraged," 234 and criminal libel statutes as "mostly dormant," 235 "not a real problem," 236 "no longer … a serious risk," 237 "obsolete legal action[s]," 238 which have "largely fallen into disuse," 239 "relics of the past," 240 "not yet buried," 241 and "like the vampire legend [which] never quite seems to die out." 242 Yet more than a decade before the 1964 Supreme Court decision in Garrison, scholars also described criminal libel statutes as latent 243 and libel actions as "almost obsolete action," 244 and prosecutions for the crime as rare 245 or unusual.…”
Section: The American Experience With Criminal Libelmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…One of the opponent's arguments against the judicial review is that having sexual intercourse and performing samesex obscene are considered as essential parts of individual rights to privacy. Concisely, right to privacy can be interpreted as the right of everyone to protect the aspects of his life to be accessed and used by others (Donald M. Gillmor, et. al, 1990).…”
Section: Contract To Right To Privacy?mentioning
confidence: 99%