1989
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9429(1989)115:2(263)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mass Conservation: 1‐D Open Channel Flow Equations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where q(s)ds is the differential for the total flow, dQ. Equation 52 also is the same result as developed by DeLong (1989).…”
Section: 3 Correction Coefficients For Channel Curvilinearitymentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where q(s)ds is the differential for the total flow, dQ. Equation 52 also is the same result as developed by DeLong (1989).…”
Section: 3 Correction Coefficients For Channel Curvilinearitymentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Therefore, equation 49 can be expressed as 50where integration is over area and the arguments for all the functions are dropped. Equation 50 is the same result as developed by DeLong (1989). These same operations applied to equation 46 result in…”
Section: 3 Correction Coefficients For Channel Curvilinearitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The weight coefficients for computing volumes and momentum content have been developed previously. Weight coefficients have been developed for equations similar to equations 41 and 44 by DeLong (1989) and Froehlich (1991). DeLong presented a momentum equation that did not include a weight coefficient on any term except the momentum-content term.…”
Section: Integral Form For Curvilinear Alignmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Froehlich questioned this result and derived a correction factor for the friction term given by k(s) ds, (45) where s is the offset distance across the cross section as measured from a reference point on the channel bank, h(s) is local depth in a cross section at cross-section offset s, qw(s) is the flow per unit width in a cross section at offset s, k(s) is the conveyance per unit width in a cross section at offset s, G(s) is the rate of change of distance along the flow line at offset s to the rate of change of distance along the channel axis (sinuosity at offset s), and SB and SE are the offset at the beginning and end of the wetted top width for the cross section. DeLong (1991) pointed out that the total conveyance applied by Froehlich (1991) was not adjusted for sinuosity and was computed assuming that the friction slope was the same for each flow line across the section. If the total conveyance is adjusted for sinuosity and the local conveyance adjusted for sinuosity is substituted into equation 45, then Mf = 1 and, therefore, does not appear in the equations.…”
Section: Integral Form For Curvilinear Alignmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and Equations 1 through 4 are similar to those presented by Cunge and others (1980) with two exceptions: they have been extended to include the volumetric effects of sinuosity with the inclusion of metric coefficients, M a and M q (DeLong 1986), and density is assumed uniform in cross section but not necessarily constant with stream distance or time. The area-weighted sinuosity coefficient, M a (DeLong 1989), may vary both with depth of flow and distance and is defined by…”
Section: Governing Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%