2018
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty2781
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mass function and dynamical study of the open clusters Berkeley 24 and Czernik 27 using ground based imaging and Gaia astrometry

Abstract: We present a U BV I photometric study of the open clusters Berkeley 24 (Be 24) and Czernik 27 (Cz 27). The radii of the clusters are determined as 2. ′ 7 and 2. ′ 3 for Be 24 and Cz 27, respectively. We use the Gaia Data Release 2 (GDR2) catalogue to estimate the mean proper motions for the clusters. We found the mean proper motion of Be 24 as 0.35 ± 0.06 mas yr −1 and 1.20 ± 0.08 mas yr −1 in right ascension and declination for Be 24 and −0.52 ± 0.05 mas yr −1 and −1.30 ± 0.05 mas yr −1 for Cz 27. We used pro… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(69 reference statements)
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are many methods to determine the membership of cluster stars using photometric, proper motions, radial velocities, polarimetric data and their combinations (Joshi et al 2012;Medhi & Tamura 2013;Gao 2014). Recently, with the availability of the Gaia DR2 catalog (Gaia Collaboration et al 2018) having unprecedented astrometric precision, the membership determination based on kinematic method (proper motions or radial velocities) becomes a reliable tool to identify the cluster members (e.g., Cantat-Gaudin et al 2018Castro-Ginard et al 2018Bisht et al 2019;Joshi et al 2020). The precise knowledge of cluster membership helps us to study the distribution of stellar mass, also known as MF, which has a fundamental importance in the study of dynamic evolution of star clusters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many methods to determine the membership of cluster stars using photometric, proper motions, radial velocities, polarimetric data and their combinations (Joshi et al 2012;Medhi & Tamura 2013;Gao 2014). Recently, with the availability of the Gaia DR2 catalog (Gaia Collaboration et al 2018) having unprecedented astrometric precision, the membership determination based on kinematic method (proper motions or radial velocities) becomes a reliable tool to identify the cluster members (e.g., Cantat-Gaudin et al 2018Castro-Ginard et al 2018Bisht et al 2019;Joshi et al 2020). The precise knowledge of cluster membership helps us to study the distribution of stellar mass, also known as MF, which has a fundamental importance in the study of dynamic evolution of star clusters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our membership criterion depends on the chosen overdensity region to define the members of the cluster from the VPD, which obviously is a compromise between losing cluster members and including field stars (see Bisht et al 2019). To minimize the field contamination, we used the Blob subset from TOPCAT for selecting the cluster region in the VPD.…”
Section: Data and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proper motions (PMs) play a vital role in order to separate field stars from the main sequence and to derive authentic fundamental parameters as well (Yadav et al 2013;Sariya et al 2018a;Bisht et al 2019). Proper motion and parallax are very reliable parameters to extract field stars from the cluster zone, because cluster stars share the same kinematical properties and distances (Rangwal et al 2019).…”
Section: Mean Proper Motion and Field Star Separationmentioning
confidence: 99%