Schmidt et al., in "Climatic impact of the long-lasting Laki eruption: Inapplicability of mass-independent sulfur isotope composition measurements," question the data and the methodology of Lanciki et al. [2012] and disagree with the conclusions by Lanciki et al. regarding the climatic aftermath of the Laki eruption. Here we respond to the issues and questions raised by Schmidt et al. and discuss the disagreements about our conclusions in Lanciki et al. [2012] (hereafter abbreviated as LA2012). (Figure 1 in LA2012) appears to be more than 6 months. We measured the annual layer thickness (from the minimum of one Ca cycle to the next) of a period of 20 years (1772-1801) encompassing the Laki signal and obtain an average annual layer thickness of 28.0 cm snow, with a standard deviation of 6.8 cm. Therefore, the standard deviation of the calculated length (12 months) of the average year is 2.9 months (= (6.8/28.0) × 12). The duration of the Laki sulfate peak is 24.0 cm. This would correspond to a 10.3 month duration for the Laki peak. However, the higher part of the peak, i.e., where the sulfate concentration exceeds the background by 100 ppb, covers 15.0 cm, corresponding to a duration of 6.4 months with a standard deviation of 1.6 month (= 2.9 × 15.0/28.0). Therefore, we believe that the LA2012 statement that the residence time of the bulk of the Laki aerosols did not exceed 6 months is supported by the ice core data.A residence time of less than 6 months for Laki aerosols, according to Greenland ice core data, is not new, nor is it limited to measurement in ice cores from Summit. For example, Wei et al. [2008] presented ice core data from multiple Greenland locations and, after examining the details of the Laki sulfate peaks and the deposition timing of other chemical indicators (Cl, Na, Cd, Bi, etc.) in ice, reached the conclusion of "a short residence time (<6 months) for most of the emissions from Laki," which is the same as that in LA2012.At Summit, Greenland, the deposition durations are 17 months for both the 1815 Tambora and 1809 Unknown eruptions [Cole-Dai et al., 2009], two confirmed low-latitude stratospheric eruptions. The atmospheric residence time of Laki aerosols of 6.4 months (or 10.3 months if the duration of the Laki sulfate signal is estimated from the baseline before to the baseline after the event) is significantly shorter.
Timing of the Beginning of the Laki SignalSchmidt et al. raise (paragraph 20) "issues" with "the age model" used in LA2012, by pointing out that "the Laki sulfate peak appears (Figure 1 in LA2012) to start in early spring 1783 when it is expected to start in early summer 1783 (because the Laki eruption commenced on 8 June 1783)." This appearance can be explained by a number of factors in snow accumulation/stratigraphy, ice core data and dating procedures. First, the assignment of time (e.g., Spring, Summer, etc.), based on the appearance of the Ca annual cycle in this case, is approximate. In general, the annual Ca peak appears in spring (April-June); but it is not poss...