2000
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a033060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mass Internal Exposure Monitoring of Population in Russia After the Chernobyl Accident

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A NaI(Tl) detector (63 mm (∅) × 63 mm) and a single-channel scintillation spectrometer (RFT-20046, Robotron, Germany) were used to perform direct in vivo determination of the 137,134 Cs body burden in about 500 inhabitants yearly from 1991 to 2000 (3,6,13). The measurements were usually conducted in school buildings with brick walls, with comparatively favourable measuring conditions in terms of signal-to-background ratio.…”
Section: Assessment Of Body Burden Of Caesium Radionuclidesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A NaI(Tl) detector (63 mm (∅) × 63 mm) and a single-channel scintillation spectrometer (RFT-20046, Robotron, Germany) were used to perform direct in vivo determination of the 137,134 Cs body burden in about 500 inhabitants yearly from 1991 to 2000 (3,6,13). The measurements were usually conducted in school buildings with brick walls, with comparatively favourable measuring conditions in terms of signal-to-background ratio.…”
Section: Assessment Of Body Burden Of Caesium Radionuclidesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measurements were usually conducted in school buildings with brick walls, with comparatively favourable measuring conditions in terms of signal-to-background ratio. They were carried out with the individual in a sitting position, bending over the detector which was resting in the lap directed towards the abdomen (13,14). The measurement time was 60-100 s. The calibration method for 137 Cs and 134 Cs measurements in vivo was developed in a study with volunteers who ingested known amounts of the radionuclides, and verified with measurements of the same persons in a well-shielded, stationary whole-body counter (15).…”
Section: Assessment Of Body Burden Of Caesium Radionuclidesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, other parameters are also to be taken into account when subjects are measured after a nuclear emergency: the spectrum and intensity of the background radiation (Gavrilin et al 1999, Zvonova et al 2000, Likhtarev et al 2006, which influence the minimum detectable activity, the dimension of the screened subject who shields the background radiation (Likhtarev et al 2006), and the contribution of extra-thyroid but internalised radionuclides, which are recorded in the detectors (Likhtarev et al 2006, Kurihara et al 2013. When the dose has to be assessed from the measurements, other sources of uncertainties also have to be taken into account: the time and route of intake (Likhtarev et al 2006, Kim et al 2016, the chemical form of the radionuclides (Stepanenko et al 1996) and the uncertainties of the biokinetic and dosimetric models (Bouville et al 1996).…”
Section: Uncertainties Applying To Dose Assessment Of Measured Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A Nal(Tl) detector (63 mm (0) x 63 mm) and a single-channel scintillation spectrometer (RFT-20046, Robotron, Germany) were used to perform direct in vivo determination of the 1 3 7 , l 3 4 Cs body burden in about 500 inhabitants every year from 1991 to 1998 [3, 5,10]. The measurements were carried out with the individual in a sitting position, bending over the detector which was resting in the lap directed towards the abdomen.…”
Section: Assessment Of Body Burden Of Caesium Radionuclidesmentioning
confidence: 99%