2017
DOI: 10.1038/s41550-017-0130
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mass inventory of the giant-planet formation zone in a solar nebula analogue

Abstract: The initial mass distribution in the solar nebula is a critical input to planet formation models that seek to reproduce today's Solar System 1 . Traditionally, constraints on the gas mass distribution are derived from observations of the dust emission from disks 2, 3 , but this approach suffers from large uncertainties in grain growth and gas-to-dust ratio 2 . On the other hand, previous observations of gas tracers only probe surface layers above the bulk mass reservoir 4 .Here we present the first partially s… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

20
197
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 144 publications
(219 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
20
197
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The peak brightness temperatures between radii of 25 and 90 AU range from ∼70 to 35 K, which are about twice the value of the gas temperatures derived by Schwarz et al (2016) from multiple transitions of the rarer 13 CO and C 18 O isotopologues. Zhang et al (2017) estimate that the C 18 O J = 3 − 2 flux contribution largely originates from within two gas scale heights of the midplane, in contrast to three to four scale heights for 12 CO J = 3 − 2. The difference in inferred gas temperatures for the isotopologues implies a steep vertical temperature gradient.…”
Section: 22mentioning
confidence: 96%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The peak brightness temperatures between radii of 25 and 90 AU range from ∼70 to 35 K, which are about twice the value of the gas temperatures derived by Schwarz et al (2016) from multiple transitions of the rarer 13 CO and C 18 O isotopologues. Zhang et al (2017) estimate that the C 18 O J = 3 − 2 flux contribution largely originates from within two gas scale heights of the midplane, in contrast to three to four scale heights for 12 CO J = 3 − 2. The difference in inferred gas temperatures for the isotopologues implies a steep vertical temperature gradient.…”
Section: 22mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Like the 12 CO channel maps, the 13 CO channel maps in Figure C2 also show a steep dropoff in intensity at a radius of ≈ 90 AU, followed by very faint emission extending out to ≈ 200 AU, which is slightly less extended than the 12 CO emission. C 18 O exhibits an outer emission ring that sharply drops off within a radius of 100 AU (Zhang et al 2017), but no emission is observed beyond this radius. The apparent differences between the isotopologues is likely primarily due to sensitivity limits, but may also be partially due to selective photodissociation in the more tenuous outer disk (e.g.…”
Section: Compared Tomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations