2009
DOI: 10.1017/s174392131000428x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mass loss and luminosities of S and C AGB stars with and without Li

Abstract: Abstract. We present the preliminary results of an analysis performed on two samples of thermally pulsing Asymptotic Giant Branch stars from our Galaxy, the first made of carbonrich sources and the second of S-type stars. We have estimated their absolute luminosities and updated rates of the stellar winds through methods based on their infrared spectrophotometry and on updated estimates of their variability and distance.We then focus on those sources in our database showing Li in their spectra looking for corr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, stars on the early AGB present on average lower Li abundances than stars at the RGB-bump. Guandalini et al (2009) have interpreted this group of stars as actually lying on the RGB. Their models are unable to interpret super Li-rich stars though.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, stars on the early AGB present on average lower Li abundances than stars at the RGB-bump. Guandalini et al (2009) have interpreted this group of stars as actually lying on the RGB. Their models are unable to interpret super Li-rich stars though.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the magnetic buoyancy scenario (Guandalini et al 2009), the mixing is thought to arise from magnetic bubbles with locally increased magnetic pressure, thus a decreased density. The magnetic field might be sustained by an α−Ω dynamo produced by a region of rotational shear below the convective envelope.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indications on the general properties of the phenomenon (velocity, effectiveness and depth) can however be obtained by fitting the observational constraints with physical or parametric models (see e.g. [15,16]). In this way one recognizes that CNO isotopes in evolved stars can be accounted for by various models; on the contrary, more stringent constraints are posed by 26 Al-rich grains (requiring very deep mixing) or by Li-rich giants (requiring mixing mechanisms on time scales shorter than 7 Be-decay).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We show how the use of recent and accurate reaction rates induces considerable differences in the nucleosinthesis results as compared to previous studies. Among the most remarkable novelties we discuss the effects of the new rates for the 14 N(p,γ) 15 O and for p-captures on oxygen isotopes. They jointly provide a much better agreement than before with presolar grain isotopic abundances and allow for a clear determination of the mass of the parent star.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%