2014
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201321980
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mass loss in main-sequence B stars

Abstract: We calculate radiatively driven wind models of main-sequence B stars and provide the wind mass-loss rates and terminal velocities. The main-sequence mass-loss rate strongly depends on the stellar effective temperature. For the hottest B stars the mass-loss rate amounts to 10 −9 M year −1 , while for the cooler ones the mass-loss rate is lower by more than three orders of magnitude. Mainsequence B stars with solar abundance and effective temperatures lower than about 15 000 K (later than spectral type B5) do no… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
134
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(142 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
(125 reference statements)
7
134
1
Order By: Relevance
“…or even smaller (10 −7 M yr −1 ) for B stars (Krticka 2014). The corresponding stellar mass should be >20 M .…”
Section: Origin Of the Absorption Gasmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…or even smaller (10 −7 M yr −1 ) for B stars (Krticka 2014). The corresponding stellar mass should be >20 M .…”
Section: Origin Of the Absorption Gasmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The values ofṀ act , listed in Table 4, are in good agreement with those obtained from the UV spectral analyses of HR 7355 (see Sec. 2) and other B-type stars with similar spectral types (Prinja 1989;Oskinova et al 2011;Krticka 2014) The indirect evaluation of the linear extension of the radio emitting region is also useful for estimating the brightness temperature of HR 7355. The average flux densities for HR 7355 are ≈ 15.5 mJy, in the frequency range 6-44 GHz.…”
Section: The Magnetosphere Of Hr 7355mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The failed convergence of the models indicates that the radiative force is too weak to drive a wind. To test this, we calculated additional models with a fixed hydrodynamical structure, where we compared the radiative force with the gravity for four different fixed mass-loss rates equal to 10 −12 M ⊙ yr −1 , 10 −13 M ⊙ yr −1 , and 10 −14 M ⊙ yr −1 (for details see Krtička 2014). In all these models, the radiative force was lower than the gravity force.…”
Section: Calculated Wind Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%