1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0197-2456(98)00055-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mass Mailing and Staff Experience in a Total Recruitment Program for a Clinical Trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
21
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The recruitment yield (enrolled/total identified) of 5.4% achieved in this study is consistent with other published studies involving large civilian multi-site studies which have reported yields ranging from 0.5% [23], 1.1% [24], 2.6% [25], 5.5% [26], to 13% [27]. However, none of the aforementioned studies involved veterans or used population-based sampling methods and therefore generalization to the current study is not straightforward.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The recruitment yield (enrolled/total identified) of 5.4% achieved in this study is consistent with other published studies involving large civilian multi-site studies which have reported yields ranging from 0.5% [23], 1.1% [24], 2.6% [25], 5.5% [26], to 13% [27]. However, none of the aforementioned studies involved veterans or used population-based sampling methods and therefore generalization to the current study is not straightforward.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Of the 31,407 subjects identified by this survey of 21 sites, 4,300 (13.7%) were enrolled, and 386 (1.2%) were randomized into the study. Similar low yields in multi-site studies have been described [13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. The unique veteran population in our study, strict inclusion [4,20].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…In this study, the Gulf War Veteran Registry was the most reliable, logical, and, from a confidentiality viewpoint, appropriate source for reaching potential study participants. From this source, 78% of the GWV contacted could be reached by mail or telephone, methods used by others [11,[13][14][15]21]. In a different patient population, where the study goal was smoking cessation, paid news advertisements were found to be superior to other recruitment methods [22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In cardiovascular trials with hard clinical endpoints such as death or hospitalization for stroke or myocardial infarction, the length of time for following participants is vital to having enough statistical power to accurately answer the research question. 2,3 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior large hypertension trials – Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program, 3,6 Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack, 7,8 and Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes 9 – demonstrated that multiple recruitment strategies are required for successful enrollment. These trials all took longer to recruit than originally anticipated, ranging from three months, approximately 10 months, to 1.5 years longer than planned.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%