1994
DOI: 10.2105/ajph.84.7.1148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mass media and school interventions for cigarette smoking prevention: effects 2 years after completion.

Abstract: The long-term cigarette smoking prevention effects of mass media and school interventions were assessed. Adolescents in two communities received both mass media and school interventions; those in two matching communities received only school interventions. Surveys of 5458 students were conducted at baseline in grades 4 through 6 and 2 years after the 4-year interventions were completed, when students were in grades 10 through 12. Students exposed to the media-plus-school interventions were found to be at lower… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
66
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 172 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] The few studies of the impact of these campaigns on youth smoking had mixed results. Community-and school-based interventions highlighted by a mass media campaign reduced smoking initiation rates among adolescents in Vermont, New York, and Montana, [21][22][23][24][25] Minnesota, 26 North Karelia, 27 and Norway, 28 but they failed to influence smoking behavior among youths in southern California 29 or the southeastern United States. 30 Existing studies have evaluated the results of research demonstration projects; it is not clear whether similar results could be expected from government-funded statewide media campaigns, which tend to target more homogeneous populations, provide less control over individual exposure, and introduce political factors that influence a program's effectiveness.…”
Section: Michael Siegel MD Mph and Lois Biener Phdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] The few studies of the impact of these campaigns on youth smoking had mixed results. Community-and school-based interventions highlighted by a mass media campaign reduced smoking initiation rates among adolescents in Vermont, New York, and Montana, [21][22][23][24][25] Minnesota, 26 North Karelia, 27 and Norway, 28 but they failed to influence smoking behavior among youths in southern California 29 or the southeastern United States. 30 Existing studies have evaluated the results of research demonstration projects; it is not clear whether similar results could be expected from government-funded statewide media campaigns, which tend to target more homogeneous populations, provide less control over individual exposure, and introduce political factors that influence a program's effectiveness.…”
Section: Michael Siegel MD Mph and Lois Biener Phdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The potential effectiveness of mass media antismoking campaigns in preventing smoking has now been established on the basis of well-evaluated research and demonstration projects in Vermont (7,8) and Minnesota (9). These field experiments show that community-and school-based interventions highlighted by a prominent mass media campaign can reduce the initiation of smoking in adolescents.…”
Section: History Current Status and Effectivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These field experiments show that community-and school-based interventions highlighted by a prominent mass media campaign can reduce the initiation of smoking in adolescents. Under the most favorable circumstances, the prevalence of smoking in young persons has been reduced by 40% (7,8).…”
Section: History Current Status and Effectivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A combined mass media and school-based anti-smoking program in Vermont decreased smoking among adolescents by 35%. 11 A 4-year, $50 million, statewide, anti-smoking media campaign in Massachusetts achieved a 50% reduction in the onset of smoking among younger adolescents. 12 A recent evaluation of the national "truth" anti-smoking campaign found that 22% of the reduction in the prevalence of youth smoking could be attributed to the campaign.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%