2012
DOI: 10.1111/qas.12004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mass modeling of caper (Capparis spinosa) with some engineering properties

Abstract: Nomenclature M = fruit mass, g; V = fruit Volume, cm 3 ; Dg = geometric mean diameter, mm; S = surface area, mm 2 ; L = length of fruits, mm; W = width of fruit, mm; T = thickness of fruit, mm; PA1 = first projected area which perpendicular to L direction, mm 2 ; PA2 = second projected area which perpendicular to W direction, mm 2 ; PA3 = third projected area which perpendicular to T direction, mm 2 ; CPA = criteria projected area, mm 2 ; SD = standard deviation; b0, b1, b2 = curve fitting parameters; X = inde… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In comparison, the indirect method involves predicting fruit weight from dimensional attributes using a model/equation (Jahns, Nielsen, & Wolfgang, 2001). Mass grading had been proven efficient and economical for grading of agricultural commodities than size based grading (Lorestani, Jaliliantabar, & Gholami, 2012) and thus, a similar correlation between mass and physical properties of guava fruits to be analyzed to encourage their efficient processing. Development of grading techniques with a combined approach of size, shape, color, or volume with their mass will be more economical and accurate as it can reduce expenses toward packaging and transportation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison, the indirect method involves predicting fruit weight from dimensional attributes using a model/equation (Jahns, Nielsen, & Wolfgang, 2001). Mass grading had been proven efficient and economical for grading of agricultural commodities than size based grading (Lorestani, Jaliliantabar, & Gholami, 2012) and thus, a similar correlation between mass and physical properties of guava fruits to be analyzed to encourage their efficient processing. Development of grading techniques with a combined approach of size, shape, color, or volume with their mass will be more economical and accurate as it can reduce expenses toward packaging and transportation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past, various effective and accurate grading systems are developed based on recent advancement in automated sorting strategies; thus, eliminating human interference (Kleynen, Leemans, & Destain, ). Lorestani, Jaliliantabar, and Gholami () also highlighted the importance of the grading by fruit mass as it was more economical than the grading based on fruit size. Grading based on the fruit mass can be accomplished by either direct weighing which is time‐consuming or by applying appropriate models based on other fruit characteristics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 100 samples of the Medlars were tested in the Biophysical laboratory and Biological laboratory of Razi University of Kermanshah, Iran. The samples were weighted and dried in an oven at 105˚C for 24 h (Lorestani, et al, 2012) and then weight loss on drying to final content weight was recorded as moisture content. The remaining material was kept in the desiccator until use.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, volume and its relationship with packing coefficient are very important because having any information about Packing coefficient of fruits could result in efficient control of fruit quality during storage. Physical characteristics of agricultural products are the most important parameters to determine the proper standards of design of grading, conveying, processing and packaging systems (Tabatabaeefar and Rajabipour, 2005;Lorestani, et al, 2012). Among these physical characteristics, mass, volume, projected area are the most important ones in determining sizing systems (Peleg and Ramraz, 1975).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%