2016
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.94.014308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mass-number and excitation-energy dependence of the spin cutoff parameter

Abstract: The spin cutoff parameter determining the nuclear level density spin distribution ρ(J) is defined through the spin projection as < J 2 z > 1/2 or equivalently for spherical nuclei, (It is needed to divide the total level density into levels as a function of J. To obtain the total level density at the neutron binding energy from the s-wave resonance count, the spin cutoff parameter is also needed. The spin cutoff parameter has been calculated as a function of excitation energy and mass with a super-conducting h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
6
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…( 31) with a factor η, which takes the values η = 0.8, 0.9 and 1.0 for the low, recommended and high values, respectively. Such a systematical error band is consistent with theoretical estimates [87,113,129,118,285]. The usual way to determine the normalization coefficient B of Eq.…”
Section: Brief Overview Of the Standard Oslo Methodssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…( 31) with a factor η, which takes the values η = 0.8, 0.9 and 1.0 for the low, recommended and high values, respectively. Such a systematical error band is consistent with theoretical estimates [87,113,129,118,285]. The usual way to determine the normalization coefficient B of Eq.…”
Section: Brief Overview Of the Standard Oslo Methodssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…( 10) for Θ rigid with η = 0.8, and 0.9 for the low (L) and recommended (R) estimate, respectively. The recommended value is consistent with theoretical estimates of σ J (S n ) in the dysprosium mass region [41][42][43][44][45]. Further, for the upper limit (H), we apply the Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov-plus-combinatorial (HFB) calculations of Ref.…”
Section: A Renormalization Of Nldssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…The level density from the previous step, ρ expt , is now used as the the theoretical level density ρ th in step 1, in lieu of ρ CT . The levels are distributed by spin J, ρ(E * , J) = P (J)ρ(E * ), assuming the Bethe spin-distribution [49], which agrees reasonably well with measurements and more sophisticated calculations [50][51][52], where the probability of a given J is…”
Section: ρ(E * ) Extractionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Ref. [51] found roughly a factor of two variability amongst various predictions and experimental constraints for σ 2 in our E * and A region (see also Figure 8). Therefore, we also investigated performing the ρ extraction described in this subsection for a factor of two increase and factor of two decrease in σ 2 .…”
Section: ρ(E * ) Extractionsupporting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation