2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.firesaf.2003.07.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mass pyrolysis rates and excess pyrolysate in fully developed enclosure fires

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
38
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
5
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8a) although they appear to follow the same trend. Namely, for the large pan fire (0.3 m) the slope of the normalized mass loss rate with respect to the normalized ventilation factor is about 0.1 as expected [3,4]. However this slope decreases as the pan size decreases.…”
Section: Mass Loss Rates For Different Sizes Of Pan Fires Openings Amentioning
confidence: 59%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…8a) although they appear to follow the same trend. Namely, for the large pan fire (0.3 m) the slope of the normalized mass loss rate with respect to the normalized ventilation factor is about 0.1 as expected [3,4]. However this slope decreases as the pan size decreases.…”
Section: Mass Loss Rates For Different Sizes Of Pan Fires Openings Amentioning
confidence: 59%
“…This work being part of continuing effort at FireSERT [3,4,8,9] to measure and model fires in enclosures yields the following conclusions:…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 3 more Smart Citations