2019
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab334c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mass–Radius Relationship for M Dwarf Exoplanets: Comparing Nonparametric and Parametric Methods

Abstract: Though they are the most abundant stars in the Galaxy, M dwarfs form only a small subset of known stars hosting exoplanets with measured radii and masses. In this paper, we analyze the mass-radius (M-R) relationship of planets around M dwarfs using M-R measurements for 24 exoplanets. In particular, we apply both parametric and nonparametric models and compare the two different fitting methods. We also use these methods to compare the results of the M dwarf M-R relationship with that from the Kepler sample. Usi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
54
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
1
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also predict some properties based on the estimated planet mass. We compared planetary masses predicted by the mass-radius relationships of Chen & Kipping (2017), Ning et al (2018) and Kanodia et al (2019). We find the mass posteriors of both Ning et al (2018) and Kanodia et al (2019) are considerably lower than for Chen & Kipping (2017), and extend down to unphysically low masses.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…We also predict some properties based on the estimated planet mass. We compared planetary masses predicted by the mass-radius relationships of Chen & Kipping (2017), Ning et al (2018) and Kanodia et al (2019). We find the mass posteriors of both Ning et al (2018) and Kanodia et al (2019) are considerably lower than for Chen & Kipping (2017), and extend down to unphysically low masses.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…There have been numerous studies which find differences in the occurrence rates for planets around M dwarfs versus earlier type stars (Hardegree-Ullman et al 2019;Hsu et al 2020), as well as the empirical distributions of mass and radius for said planets (Bonfils et al 2013;Dressing & Charbonneau 2015). These results motivate independent statistical studies of M-dwarf exoplanet populations (Cloutier & Menou 2020;Kanodia et al 2019). However, the aforementioned studies suffer from a small M-dwarf planet sample.…”
Section: Toi-1728b In M-dwarf Planet Parameter Spacementioning
confidence: 91%
“…For simplicity, we assumed the best-case scenario, namely zero (mutual) inclinations and zero eccentricities of the planetary orbits. We estimate the planetary masses from the observed radius using the MRExo package 14 , which performs non-parametric fitting of the mass-radius relation (Ning et al 2018;Kanodia et al 2019). Our dynamical stability pipeline is described as follows.…”
Section: Multi-planet System Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%