1991
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3476(05)80733-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mass screening in Japan increased the detection of infants with neuroblastoma without a decrease in cases in older children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
43
2
1

Year Published

1995
1995
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
43
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Several reports have shown that the relative frequencies of the tumor failed to decrease in older children following screening (Bessho et al, 1991) or have suggested that a large number of the tumors found by screening might otherwise have spontaneously regressed (Nishi et al, 1995). We have estimated the age-specific incidence of neuroblastoma, using data from the Japan Children's Cancer Registry, to determine whether screening has resulted in any changes in the age-specific annual incidence rate.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several reports have shown that the relative frequencies of the tumor failed to decrease in older children following screening (Bessho et al, 1991) or have suggested that a large number of the tumors found by screening might otherwise have spontaneously regressed (Nishi et al, 1995). We have estimated the age-specific incidence of neuroblastoma, using data from the Japan Children's Cancer Registry, to determine whether screening has resulted in any changes in the age-specific annual incidence rate.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A simple non-invasive test exists (Tuchman et al, 1987;Mathieu et al, 1993), and a mass screening programme was started in Japan in 1985 after several pilot studies. After more than 7 years of operation, however, there is still little evidence that screening for neuroblastoma is effective (Hanawa et al, 1990;Nishi et al, 1992), and several researchers have expressed doubts about the appropriateness of the procedure set up in Japan, suggesting in particular that screening at 6 months is too early (Cole and Parker, 1990;Bessho et al, 1991;Parker et al, 1991). Screening efficacy for neuroblastoma is still an open question, and before embarking on large evaluation trials it is necessary to review the epidemiological and biological evidence to assess whether the evaluation of screening at an age older than 6 months is feasible, or even if it is needed at all, given the progress recently made on understanding the biology of the disease which suggests that neuroblastoma is not a single disease entity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 Since introduction of the screening, the incidence of neuroblastomas in infants has increased, as well as the number of stage 1, 2, and 4s neuroblastomas, as can be seen in Fig 4. However, there has been no significant change in the number of stage 3 or 4 diseases diagnosed in older children. 7 According to the Japan Children's Cancer Registry, there seems to be some difference in the site of origin of neuroblastomas detected by mass screening compared with those presenting clinically. Tumors of retroperitoneal and pelvic origin are more frequent in mass screening positive cases (Fig 5).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%