Alteration in glycosylation has been observed in cancer. However, monitoring glycosylation changes during breast cancer progression is difficult in humans. In this study, we used a well-characterized transplantable breast tumor mouse model, the mouse mammary tumor virus-polyoma middle T antigen, to observe early changes in glycosylation. We have previously used the said mouse model to look at O-linked glycosylation changes with breast cancer. In this glycan biomarker discovery study, we examined N-linked glycan variations during breast cancer progression of the mouse model but this time doubling the number of mice and blood draw points. N-glycans from total mouse serum glycoproteins were profiled using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization Fourier transform-ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry at the onset, progression, and removal of mammary tumors. Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer death and the most frequently diagnosed cancer among women worldwide (1). In the United States alone, ϳ40,000 deaths and 210,000 new cases were expected in 2010 (2). Incidence rates continue to rise especially in many developing and westernized countries. Unfortunately, early stages of breast cancer show no noticeable symptoms. Early diagnosis is critical because the chance of survival is greater in early stage (Stage I and II) breast cancer. It is estimated that 98% of U. S. women will survive longer than 5 years if the cancer is detected early. At late stages (Stages III and IV), however, only 28% will survive longer than 5 years (1).Currently, carbohydrate antigen 15-3 (CA 15-3) is the most common clinical serum marker for breast cancer. This marker uses immunoassay to detect MUC-1, a mucin glycoprotein overexpressed with breast cancer. Other markers for breast cancer include carcinoembryonic antigen, an anchored glycoprotein involved in cell adhesion, and CA 27.29, another MUC-1-derived glycoprotein marker. A common feature of these three markers is that all are proteins containing glycoforms.However, the current markers described above are not recommended by the American Society of Clinical Oncology as markers for screening, diagnostic, or staging tests for breast cancer (3). During the early stages of breast cancer, the sensitivity (i.e. patients correctly identified) of these markers is less than 25% (3-7). Moreover, the specificity (i.e. people without cancer correctly identified) is also problematic: up to 20%-30% of women without breast cancer, i.e. healthy individuals, women with benign breast lesions, people with benign diseases such as liver disease, and people with other types of advanced adenocarcinoma, have elevated levels of the said markers (3-7). Thus, an elevated marker level is not specific to breast cancer and may lead to false positive diagnoses for the healthy individual.Aberrant glycosylation is observed in the progression of many types of diseases, including different cancers (8, 9). Glycosylation, one of the most common forms of post-translational modification, is highly sensitive to ...