2018
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b00120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mass Spectrometry-Based Immunoassay for the Quantification of Banned Ruminant Processed Animal Proteins in Vegetal Feeds

Abstract: The ban of processed animal proteins (PAPs) in feed for farmed animals introduced in 2001 was one of the main EU measures to control the bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) crisis. Currently, microscopy and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) are the official methods for the detection of illegal PAPs in feed. However, the progressive release of the feed ban, recently with the legalization of nonruminant PAPs for the use in aquaculture, requires the development of alternative methods to determine the species ori… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For a porcine blood meal and a porcine spray-dried plasma sample, the HPD protocol was compared with an extraction in the same buffer and subsequent in-solution digestion (ISD) of the supernatant. An absorption measurement at 280 nm indicated that HPD released more peptides compared to ISD, as was seen in the previous study for a bovine meat and bone meal sample . Peptide amounts released by HPD were nearly 2 times higher in BM and 5 times higher in SDP (data not shown).…”
Section: Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For a porcine blood meal and a porcine spray-dried plasma sample, the HPD protocol was compared with an extraction in the same buffer and subsequent in-solution digestion (ISD) of the supernatant. An absorption measurement at 280 nm indicated that HPD released more peptides compared to ISD, as was seen in the previous study for a bovine meat and bone meal sample . Peptide amounts released by HPD were nearly 2 times higher in BM and 5 times higher in SDP (data not shown).…”
Section: Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…PAP and blood product samples were prepared for LC-MS/MS analysis using a protocol we validated and published recently . Protein extraction and digestion were performed in a single step using heterogeneous phase digestion (HPD).…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Proteomic-based methods using (tandem) mass spectrometry (MS) were, in a recent scientific opinion by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), identified as promising tools to complement current standard techniques of feed PAP detection [18]. Different laboratories specialized in feed and food safety have been developing promising MS based tools for the species-specific detection, differentiation and quantification of animal proteins [19,20,21,22]. Most of these methods are targeted approaches which are based on the detection of a known peptide or protein of which the sequence information is available [23,24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research at the BfR in projects funded by the German Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture currently also focuses on mass spectrometry methods for detection of terrestrial animal species in highly processed feed. Unlike the global spectral library‐based methods developed at the IMR, researchers at the BfR and its collaboration partner, the Natural and Medical Sciences Institute at the University of TĂŒbingen (NMI), focus on targeted mass spectrometry analysis (Steinhilber et al., ). This approach allows a more accurate estimation of the abundance of selected PAP animal species in unknown samples, but strongly relies on the discovery of suitable marker peptides, which the IMR database can provide.…”
Section: Description Of Work Programmementioning
confidence: 99%