2017
DOI: 10.1080/14789450.2017.1365604
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mass spectrometry-based proteomics in cancer research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Related to this, new advances in MS instrumentation, acquisition methods, and associated informatics tools for data processing benefit the scientific community through all phases of the biomarker pipeline, i.e., discovery, verification and validation phases. MS instrumentations are becoming considerably more sensitive and faster, able to achieve higher selectivity and confidence in the peptide identification process [70]. Therefore, it is a great opportunity to screen clinically relevant samples and generate comprehensive lists of candidate biomarkers using different acquisition methods such as data-dependent acquisition (DDA) or the more recently emerged data-independent acquisition (DIA) [71].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Related to this, new advances in MS instrumentation, acquisition methods, and associated informatics tools for data processing benefit the scientific community through all phases of the biomarker pipeline, i.e., discovery, verification and validation phases. MS instrumentations are becoming considerably more sensitive and faster, able to achieve higher selectivity and confidence in the peptide identification process [70]. Therefore, it is a great opportunity to screen clinically relevant samples and generate comprehensive lists of candidate biomarkers using different acquisition methods such as data-dependent acquisition (DDA) or the more recently emerged data-independent acquisition (DIA) [71].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, extendibility of targeted proteomic MS assays to analyzing new proteins is convenient in a time-and cost-efficient manner. While it takes only a few weeks for the development of a parallel reaction monitoring (PRM) assay for new proteins, conventional antibody-based methods need months and higher costs to establish a new assay (2). All these advocate targeted proteomics as a promising screening tool in applications requiring urgent diagnostic needs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Targeted proteomic MS has been gaining popularity as a promising clinical diagnostic tool to track protein/peptide biomarkers, such as in cancer (2) and cardiovascular disease (3). However, its potential has not been well-exploited in infectious disease diagnostics.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of these applications use conventional data-dependent acquisition (DDA) or targeted methods such as single or multiple reaction monitoring (SRM/MRM) which have been comprehensively reviewed elsewhere. [10][11][12] In this review, we focus on the use of dataindependent acquisition (DIA) (also known as sequential window acquisition of all theoretical mass spectra (SWATH-MS)) 13 and provide an overview of specific applications in cancer proteomics to inform molecular classification, biomarker discovery and the identification of new drug targets. This review will focus on DIA-MS applications in tissue and cell line analysis, and readers who are interested in the use of this technology in liquid biopsies and plasma proteomics are referred to these excellent reviews on the topic.…”
Section: Lukas Krasnymentioning
confidence: 99%