2003
DOI: 10.1002/rcm.1294
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mass spectrometry for the detection of differentially expressed proteins: a comparison of surface‐enhanced laser desorption/ionization and capillary electrophoresis/mass spectrometry

Abstract: The discovery of biomarkers is currently attracting much interest as it harbors great potential for the diagnosis and monitoring of human diseases. Here we have used two advanced mass spectroscopy based technologies, surface enhanced laser desorption ionization (SELDI-MS) and capillary electrophoresis/mass spectrometry (CE/MS), to obtain proteomic patterns of urine samples from patients suffering from membranous glomerulonephritis (MGN) and healthy volunteers. The results indicate that CE/MS analysis is able t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
152
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 191 publications
(152 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
152
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mass spectral ion peaks representing identical molecules at different charge states were deconvoluted into single masses using MosaiquesVisu software [44]. Migration time and ion signal intensity (amplitude) were normalized using internal polypeptide standards [45], [46].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mass spectral ion peaks representing identical molecules at different charge states were deconvoluted into single masses using MosaiquesVisu software [44]. Migration time and ion signal intensity (amplitude) were normalized using internal polypeptide standards [45], [46].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CE-MS was compared to surface-enhanced laser desorption ionization (SELDI) MS [122]. SELDI profiles of polypeptides from urine of patients suffering from glomerulonephritis were sparser, showed lower resolution and mass accuracy, and also were much more concentration dependent than CE-MS. By comparing urine from patients and healthy control, SELDI-MS identified three polypeptides as potential markers for glomerulonephritis, whereas CE-MS found about 200 potential biomarkers among urinary polypeptides.…”
Section: Msmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, no single polypeptide was identified that would be characteristic for a specific disease and simultaneously absent in all control samples [207]. Urine of patients with kidney diseases provided 27 exclusive polypeptides and 13 others, present in control, were missing [122,212,215,216]. Similarly, CE-MS/MS was used to analyze urinary samples from 112 patients with type II diabetes.…”
Section: Urinary Proteinsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The essential information that needs to be extracted from an entire CE-MS run is the identity and quantity of detected polypeptides. We therefore developed MosaiquesVisu (available at www.proteomiques.com) as an approach towards extracting information from these highly complex spectra [12].…”
Section: Software and Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was certainly a major step forward with respect to practicability, since alternative approaches like 2-DE followed by MS or HPLC-MS could be operated only by skilled personnel and were time consuming. Unfortunately, soon the price for simplicity became obvious: only a very small fraction of polypeptides was detectable on the chip surface [12]. The low resolution and accuracy -while easing interpretation of the datatogether with debatable study design raised serious concerns about the validity of the data [13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%