2009
DOI: 10.1255/ejms.1003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mass Spectrometry of Metal Complexes of Bis-Quinolizidine Alkaloids: Electron Ionization and Fast Atom Bombardment Mass Spectral Study of Copper(II) (–)-Sparteine and (–)-α-Isosparteine Complexes

Abstract: The electron ionization (EI) and fast atom bombardment (FAB) mass spectral fragmentations of ten copper(II) dichloride (dibromide, diformate, diacetate and dithiocyanate) complexes of (-)-sparteine and (-)-alpha-isosparteine were investigated. Fragmentation pathways, elucidation of which was assisted by accurate mass measurements and metastable transitions (EI-MS), as well as FAB/collision-induced dissociation (CID) mass spectral measurements are discussed. The data obtained create the basis for the differenti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 2 presents the values of m 1 , m 2 , and m 3 coefficients for compounds 1-6 as : Table 2, the differences between the m 1 -m 3 values of 5 and 6 can be sufficient to distinguish the copper (II) of 2-methylsparteine 6 from the zinc (II) complex of 2-methylsparteine 5. It ought to be pointed out that, as was shown by us earlier, [17] the copper complex 6 have higher values of m 1 , m 2 , and m 3 coefficients than those of the zinc complex 1. Moreover, the zinc complex 2 have lower values of m 2 and m 3 than m 2 and m 3 of copper complex 6.…”
mentioning
confidence: 56%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Table 2 presents the values of m 1 , m 2 , and m 3 coefficients for compounds 1-6 as : Table 2, the differences between the m 1 -m 3 values of 5 and 6 can be sufficient to distinguish the copper (II) of 2-methylsparteine 6 from the zinc (II) complex of 2-methylsparteine 5. It ought to be pointed out that, as was shown by us earlier, [17] the copper complex 6 have higher values of m 1 , m 2 , and m 3 coefficients than those of the zinc complex 1. Moreover, the zinc complex 2 have lower values of m 2 and m 3 than m 2 and m 3 of copper complex 6.…”
mentioning
confidence: 56%
“…[10][11][12][13][14][15] Some effort has been devoted to the electron ionization and fast atom bombardment mass spectral study for differentiation of ligand, as well as metals in the series of Zn +2 and Cu +2 dichloride (dibromide, diacetate, diformate, dithioacetate) complexes of (-)-sparteine and (-)-aisosparteine. [16,17] Several principles are fragmentally used to predict stabilities and binding preferences: the Irving-Williams series [18] and the hard-soft acid-base concept. The Irving-Williams series state the complex stabilities should typically follow their order Co +2 < Ni +2 < Cu +2 > Zn +2 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…show antihypertensive, antipyretic, anti-inflammatory, antiarrhythmic, diuretic, hypoglicemic, hypotensive, antidiabetic, respiratory depressant and stimulant, and uterotonic properties [5, 6]. The mass spectrometry study of bis-quinolizidine alkaloids has been stimulated by the evidence of the method's ability to distinguish their stereoisomers, metamers, and positional isomers [7–14]. The main characteristic of the so-called “hard” electron-impact induced ionization (EI) of mass fragmentation of bis-quinolizidine alkaloid molecular ions is the dependence of the fragmentation pathway of the bis-quinolizidine skeleton on the stereochemistry of the A/B and C/D ring junctions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%