2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.cherd.2013.01.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mass transfer behavior of liquid–liquid slug flow in circular cross-section microchannel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
59
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
59
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to realize even more efficient heat and mass transfer efficiency, some novel equipments with unconventional structure are observed in laboratory and industrial application. Circular cross-section [42] and square microchannels [39] are introduced to investigate the performance of liquid-liquid slug microflow. Some helically coiled tubes have also been proposed to enhance the mass transfer.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to realize even more efficient heat and mass transfer efficiency, some novel equipments with unconventional structure are observed in laboratory and industrial application. Circular cross-section [42] and square microchannels [39] are introduced to investigate the performance of liquid-liquid slug microflow. Some helically coiled tubes have also been proposed to enhance the mass transfer.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is because the narrower the microchannel, the larger was the ratio of the interface area (between aqueous and organic phases) to the volume of the aqueous and organic phases, which can provide better mass transfer performance due to the higher mass transfer coefficient and volumetric mass transfer coefficient [26]. In addition, the extraction equilibrium was hardly achieved even with a very slow flow rate in the case of w = 800-1000 μm, while it was easily achieved in the narrow micro flow channel less than or equal to 100 μm (not shown).…”
Section: Effect Of Channel Width On the Extraction Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, they suggested that the volumetric mass transfer for the microchannel is likely to be higher than that for conventional reactors employing mixer-settlers, centrifugal extractors, and spray columns. In addition, Xu et al (2013) examined the mass transfer performance in the alkaline hydrolysis of n-butyl acetate, and found that the volumetric mass transfer coefficient for a circular cross-section microchannel was greater than that for an agitated contactor and a packed extraction column. They also expressed the volumetric mass transfer as a function of slug velocity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%