1991
DOI: 10.1016/0300-9467(91)85005-g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mass transfer characteristics of gases in n-decane at elevated pressures and temperatures in agitated reactors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The multistep physical gas absorption method was used to obtain the equilibrium solubility and the volumetric mass-transfer coefficient values of CO 2 and N 2 in the three PFCs used. This experimental procedure used was similar to that reported by Chang, Chang et al, Chang and Morsi, , and Tekie et al It should also be mentioned that one batch of the PFCs was used in all experiments and no physical or chemical changes were observed. The experimental procedure followed is given below: A predetermined volume of liquid was charged at room temperature into the reactor. The reactor was closed, and the liquid was degassed using the vacuum pump to reach the saturation pressure of the liquid. The gas was charged into the preheater after vacuuming any remaining gas. The contents of the reactor and the preheater were heated to a desired temperature. The initial pressure ( P I,Ph ) and temperature ( T I,Ph ) of the preheater were recorded. The gas was charged into the reactor at the same temperature and at an initial predetermined pressure ( P I ). The reactor content was stirred at a given mixing speed until the thermodynamic equilibrium, characterized by a constant final pressure in the reactor ( P F ), was reached.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The multistep physical gas absorption method was used to obtain the equilibrium solubility and the volumetric mass-transfer coefficient values of CO 2 and N 2 in the three PFCs used. This experimental procedure used was similar to that reported by Chang, Chang et al, Chang and Morsi, , and Tekie et al It should also be mentioned that one batch of the PFCs was used in all experiments and no physical or chemical changes were observed. The experimental procedure followed is given below: A predetermined volume of liquid was charged at room temperature into the reactor. The reactor was closed, and the liquid was degassed using the vacuum pump to reach the saturation pressure of the liquid. The gas was charged into the preheater after vacuuming any remaining gas. The contents of the reactor and the preheater were heated to a desired temperature. The initial pressure ( P I,Ph ) and temperature ( T I,Ph ) of the preheater were recorded. The gas was charged into the reactor at the same temperature and at an initial predetermined pressure ( P I ). The reactor content was stirred at a given mixing speed until the thermodynamic equilibrium, characterized by a constant final pressure in the reactor ( P F ), was reached.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…7 illustrates that the gas-liquid interfacial area a values increase remarkably with the increase of pressure. These effects can be explained as follows according to Chang and Morsi [12]. The gas solubility in the liquid phase increases with pressure, it results in decreasing both the liquid surface tension and liquid viscosity.…”
Section: Influence Of Pressurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In physical terms, the above equation implies that the impeller tip velocity must exceed the gas rising velocity a certain number of times so that all big gas bubbles supplied can be broken up into small bubbles. Equation (53) has been confirmed experimentally by Mehta and Sharma [79], but it has been criticised by DeGraaf et al [95] for not taking into account the effect of impeller position (depth). DeGraaf et al [95] also claim that Eq.…”
Section: Axial-dispersion Impellersmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Other investigators [52][53][54][55][56] used the physical absorption method combined with the Peng-Robinson equation of state [57] to evaluate k^a for the mass transfer of several gases (not oxygen) in organic and aqueous solutions at pressures up to 5.5 MPa (54.3 atm) and temperatures up to 428 K (155°C).…”
Section: Fin-mentioning
confidence: 99%