2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2012.05.056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mass transfer in a membrane aerated biofilm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was better when the COD was high (Figure 5c). This could be probably explained by a better matter transfer by diffusion in the boundary layer, which was created (in the absence of agitation) between the liquid phase and the biofilm (Picard, 2011;Lé, 2008). Figure 6a shows that turbidity was eliminated for all tests.…”
Section: Adaptation Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It was better when the COD was high (Figure 5c). This could be probably explained by a better matter transfer by diffusion in the boundary layer, which was created (in the absence of agitation) between the liquid phase and the biofilm (Picard, 2011;Lé, 2008). Figure 6a shows that turbidity was eliminated for all tests.…”
Section: Adaptation Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the presence of the biofilm, colloidal matter can be eliminated by adsorption. Dissolved matter can be removed by a complex mechanism involving convection, diffusion, adsorption, hydrolysis and finally, the degradation reaction itself (Picard, 2011). Some pollutants like heavy metals, dyes and refractory organic matter could be removed by biosorption through absorption, adsorption, and ion exchange (Gadd, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, for both reactors, the biofilms began to partially fall off after 42 d. However, the removal rate of NH4 + under the higher aeration intensity tended to be higher than under the weak aeration intensity, which was consistent with the experimental conclusions of Nie (2015). Within a certain aeration intensity range, the DO concentration increases with the increasing aeration, and thus improves the activity and metabolism of the nitrite oxidizing bacteria that are aerobic and contribute to the greater removal performance of NH4 + in the treatment of papermaking wastewater (Picard et al 2012). In contrast, if the aeration intensity is small, the low DO concentration will reduce the activity of the nitrite oxidizing bacteria, as well as the removal efficiency of NH4 + .…”
Section: Effect Of the Aeration Intensity On The Removal Performance mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the mass transfer is one of the most vital factors in biofilm treatment. One way to enhance oxygen transfer in a biofilm is to directly feed the biofilm gaseous oxygen through aeration (Pan et al 2016;Mendoza-Lera et al 2017), which also accelerates soluble substrates being transferred by diffusion from the liquid (generally aqueous) phase circulated along the inside of the biofilm (Picard et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within biofilms, particularly when their permeability is low as in most purely bacterial biofilms, diffusion governs solute transport 10 , 20 , 21 . However, in more permeable biofilms, advection can sustain mass transport, provided that the pressure gradient is sufficiently large 22 , 23 . The enhancement of solute transport in permeable biofilms likely modulates the metabolic activity, however, this has not been investigated for complex phototrophic biofilms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%