1990
DOI: 10.1002/ceat.270130115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mass transfer in countercurrent and cocurrent bubble columns

Abstract: The hydrodynamic and mass transfer characteristics in countercurrent, cocurrent and liquid batch operations with various Newtonian liquids were studied experimentally using the same bubble column. Taking the effects of gas sparger geometries, operating variables and liquid properties into account, empirical correlations were obtained for the gas hold-up and the volumetric liquidphase mass transfer coefficient.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But there is a small error in the heterogeneous regime, namely the overall hold-up slightly increases with increasing liquid velocities, which is similar to information reported in references. 3,4 The reason could be that the rise in velocity of the gas bubble decreases with increasing liquid velocities in a counter-current operation and results in increasing the residence time of a gas bubble in the column, and in the overall hold-up. This means that the retarding effects on the rising bubbles arising www.soci.org H Jin et al from the counter-current flow of the liquid makes the operation of the column more effective.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…But there is a small error in the heterogeneous regime, namely the overall hold-up slightly increases with increasing liquid velocities, which is similar to information reported in references. 3,4 The reason could be that the rise in velocity of the gas bubble decreases with increasing liquid velocities in a counter-current operation and results in increasing the residence time of a gas bubble in the column, and in the overall hold-up. This means that the retarding effects on the rising bubbles arising www.soci.org H Jin et al from the counter-current flow of the liquid makes the operation of the column more effective.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Based on the experimental results, a correlation is developed for the centreline hold-up with respect to gas velocity (u g ), liquid velocity (u l ) and height to diameter ratio (H/D) as shown in Equation (4). Figure 6 shows a comparison of calculated and experimental ε g, centre values.…”
Section: The Correlation Of the Centreline Hold-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The wide size distribution of bubbles is known to create difficulties in the measurement of a, particularly by chemical methods. 67,68 (8) The presence of adventious impurities and surface-active agents affects fractional gas holdup ( G ) and, hence, k L a and a. Table 3.…”
Section: Collection Of Data Setsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The energy was supplied to the bubble column by the introduction of gas. The gassed power consumption per unit mass is V G × g. The mass transfer coe cient for the bubble column was estimated using the following correlation (Seno, Uchida, & Tsuyutani, 1990): (1)…”
Section: Spectroscopymentioning
confidence: 99%