1990
DOI: 10.1016/0009-2509(90)80113-s
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mass transfer in jet loop reactors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
28
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, thermophilic MBRs have shown a higher level of fouling due to elevated concentration of EPS when compared to mesophilic MBRs probably because thermophilic sludge contains higher levels of small particles than mesophilic sludge (Visvanathan et al 2007). In a jet loop reactor, dispersion is performed by a liquid jet drive (Farizoglu and Keskinler 2006;Dirix and van der Wiele 1990;Dutta and Raghavan 1987) whereby liquid is injected at high velocity to cause a fine dispersion of liquid and gaseous phases. The formation of bubbles permits better oxygen transfer to the microorganisms and grants homogeneous biomass dispersion (Ince et al 2013).…”
Section: Variations In Mbr Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, thermophilic MBRs have shown a higher level of fouling due to elevated concentration of EPS when compared to mesophilic MBRs probably because thermophilic sludge contains higher levels of small particles than mesophilic sludge (Visvanathan et al 2007). In a jet loop reactor, dispersion is performed by a liquid jet drive (Farizoglu and Keskinler 2006;Dirix and van der Wiele 1990;Dutta and Raghavan 1987) whereby liquid is injected at high velocity to cause a fine dispersion of liquid and gaseous phases. The formation of bubbles permits better oxygen transfer to the microorganisms and grants homogeneous biomass dispersion (Ince et al 2013).…”
Section: Variations In Mbr Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ejector performance of gassolid flow through ejector and analysis and testing of high entrainment single nozzle ejectors with variable area mixing tubes [6,7] was carried out for different ejector geometries with fixed mixing tube length 10 times the mixing tube diameter. In the experimental investigation given in mass transfer in jet loop reactors [8], the results showed that mixing tube length seems to have no obvious effect and changes of L/D ratio from 2 to10 results give in a slight decrease in the efficiency of ejector. On the other hand [9] showed that ejector with high L/D ratio values creates higher volumetric mass transfer coefficients compared to that with a lower values.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The effect of different operating conditions and ejector geometry parameters on the performance of ejector has been experimentally investigated by several researchers [10][11][12][13][14][15]. From those authors, Dirix and van de Wiele [13] and Cramers et al [15] have studied in more detail concerning the influence of geometrical parameter of ejector such as mixing tube length on the hydrodynamics and mass transfer characteristics of ejector.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…From those authors, Dirix and van de Wiele [13] and Cramers et al [15] have studied in more detail concerning the influence of geometrical parameter of ejector such as mixing tube length on the hydrodynamics and mass transfer characteristics of ejector. Unfortunately, there were contradictory results in their experiments, especially on the influence of the mixing tube on the volumetric mass transfer coefficient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%