1964
DOI: 10.1016/0009-2509(64)85074-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mass transfer in the continuous phase around axisymmetric bodies of revolution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
146
0
5

Year Published

1974
1974
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 284 publications
(160 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
9
146
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The result coincides with that of Mashelkar and Chavan15)except that a diffe ent set of parameters is used. Average Sherwood number Sh based on a log-mean driving force is defined as Sh--(llx)Pe* ]n9 (ll) in which (13) in which f=1-f and the complete velocity profile is replaced by an asymptotic linear profile.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The result coincides with that of Mashelkar and Chavan15)except that a diffe ent set of parameters is used. Average Sherwood number Sh based on a log-mean driving force is defined as Sh--(llx)Pe* ]n9 (ll) in which (13) in which f=1-f and the complete velocity profile is replaced by an asymptotic linear profile.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(9) and (10) are virtually identical. The value of the coefficient B 2 is found to be between 0.55 and 0.95 [25][26][27][28][29][30][31]. Mass transfer between fluidized solid particles and liquid has been studied extensively over a wide range of Reynolds numbers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the complexity of the 3D-flow around ellipsoids of revolution (Geissler, 1974;Rosenfeld et al, 1992), it is very difficult to obtain the gradient velocity and concentration at the fluid-particle interface outside the body, so the mass transfer rate is usually expressed in terms of the overall mass transfer coefficient (Strumillo and Kudra, 1986;Saravacos, 1995). As a result, as an approach the mean convective mass transfer coefficient on the surface of a spheroid can be obtained using either of the following methods: a) agreement between the predicted and experimental data using, for example, the least squares error technique (Queiroz, 1994;Carmo, 2004;Carmo and Lima, 2005) or b) empirical and theoretical mathematical correlations (Lochiel and Calderbank, 1964;Masliyah and Epstein, 1972;Clift et al, 1978;Coutelieris et al, 1995;Feng and Michaelides, 1997).…”
Section: Analytical Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%