Massification and Diversity of Higher Education Systems: Interplay of Complex Dimensions

Abstract

This paper provides a synthetic overview of the complex dimensions that shape the interrelations between the massification of higher education systems and their structure and composition. Many higher education systems worldwide expanded extensively in the last decades, and have undergone wide and deep structural changes. Most notably, the diversity of many higher education systems has increased dramatically, both horizontally and vertically. We address in this paper the following issues: external and internal boundaries of higher education systems; top-down and bottom-up forces; globalization and supra-national trends; flexibility; and public and private sectors. These themes highlight most crucial issues to which higher education policy makers are advised to pay attention to when deliberating what are the best ways to implement the expansion of their higher education systems, and what should be the desirable diversity in their national contexts.

Arts Education Academics’ Perceptions of eLearning & Teaching in Australian Early Childhood and Primary ITE Degrees

“…The globalisation of the world economy, economic rationalist funding models, and the development of an international higher education 'market place' have resulted in an expansion of the higher education sector and in fundamental shifts in the work of universities and academics (Guri-Rosenblit, Sebkova, & Teichler, 2007;Hanson, 2009;Sadler, 2011;White 2007;Winter, 2009). In the UK, Harris (2005) writes "The massification and internationalization of higher education has transformed the university…to a consumer driven system…the student has come to be viewed as a consumer" (p. 424).…”

Inclusion in an age of mobility

“…The moves for greater inclusion took place alongside and perhaps inseparable from this move to mass higher education (described in Mayhew, Deer, and Dua 2004), sometimes called the massification of higher education (contextualised in Brennan and Naidoo 2008;Guri-Rosenblit, Š ebková, and Teichler 2007;Rossi 2010). Throughout this process the assumption, largely unquestioned, seems to have been that these various social groups must be incorporated, assimilated and acculturated into the academy as it was then constituted (discussed from different perspectives in Crossan et al 2003;Greenbank 2007;O'Donnell and Tobbell 2007;Reay, Crozier, and Clayton 2010).…”

“Everyone Wants to Be Like Harvard” – Or Do They? Cherishing All Missions Equally

“…The terms "unitary" and "binary" are similarly becoming out-dated. What was once decried as mission creep may more accurately be described as mission evolution (Guri-Rosenblit et al 2007). …”