2020
DOI: 10.1007/s12065-020-00457-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Massive MIMO perspective: improved sea lion for optimal antenna selection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, the performance of classification was analyzed by analyzing the Type I and Type II measures. Here, “Type I measures were positive measures like Accuracy, Sensitivity, Specificity, Precision, Negative Predictive Value (NPV), F1Score and Mathews correlation coefficient (MCC), and Type II measures were negative measures like False positive rate (FPR), False negative rate (FNR), and False Discovery Rate (FDR).” The experimental analysis was conducted by considering the “number of population as 10 and maximum number of iteration as 100.” The performance of the suggested approach was compared with grey wolf optimization (GWO) (Mirjalili et al , 2014), improved sea lion optimization (ISLO) (Rao and Rao, 2021), COA (Yuan et al , 2020), JA (Venkata Rao, 2016), DNN (Apoorva and Sangeetha, 2021), fuzzy (Ansari et al , 2013), SVM (Manjula Devi and Seenivasagam, 2020) and improved sealion optimization algorithm-attention pyramid-convolutional neural network (BU-SLnO)-AP-CNN (Rao and Rao, 2021; Manne et al , 2020).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Here, the performance of classification was analyzed by analyzing the Type I and Type II measures. Here, “Type I measures were positive measures like Accuracy, Sensitivity, Specificity, Precision, Negative Predictive Value (NPV), F1Score and Mathews correlation coefficient (MCC), and Type II measures were negative measures like False positive rate (FPR), False negative rate (FNR), and False Discovery Rate (FDR).” The experimental analysis was conducted by considering the “number of population as 10 and maximum number of iteration as 100.” The performance of the suggested approach was compared with grey wolf optimization (GWO) (Mirjalili et al , 2014), improved sea lion optimization (ISLO) (Rao and Rao, 2021), COA (Yuan et al , 2020), JA (Venkata Rao, 2016), DNN (Apoorva and Sangeetha, 2021), fuzzy (Ansari et al , 2013), SVM (Manjula Devi and Seenivasagam, 2020) and improved sealion optimization algorithm-attention pyramid-convolutional neural network (BU-SLnO)-AP-CNN (Rao and Rao, 2021; Manne et al , 2020).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental analysis was conducted by considering the "number of population as 10 and maximum number of iteration as 100." The performance of the suggested approach was compared with grey wolf optimization (GWO) (Mirjalili et al, 2014), improved sea lion optimization (ISLO) (Rao and Rao, 2021), COA (Yuan et al, 2020), JA (Venkata Rao, 2016), DNN (Apoorva and Sangeetha, 2021), fuzzy (Ansari et al, 2013), SVM (Manjula Devi and Seenivasagam, 2020) and improved sealion optimization algorithm-attention pyramidconvolutional neural network (BU-SLnO)-AP-CNN (Rao and Rao, 2021;Manne et al, 2020). IJPCC 19,4…”
Section: Results and Discussion 61 Experimental Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The suggested optimum TAS design was implemented in “MATLAB,” and the outcomes were displayed. Accordingly, the supremacy of the presented HS‐WA model was evaluated over existing models, namely, the modified velocity vector‐based gravitational search algorithm (MV‐GSA), 36 the improved sea lion optimization (I‐SLnO), 37 the SLnO, 34 the WOA, 29 and the particle swarm optimization (PSO) 38 . Here, two sets were used for the analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed optimal TAS model was implemented in "MATLAB" and the outcomes were noticed. Accordingly, the supremacy of the presented HS-WA model was evaluated over existing models namely, MV-GSA [27], I-SLnO [28], SLnO [24] and WOA [25]. Here, analysis was done using 2 setups.…”
Section: Simulation Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%