2005
DOI: 10.1007/s00192-005-0038-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Massive prolapse of the urethral mucosa following periurethral injection of calcium hydroxylapatite for stress urinary incontinence

Abstract: The injection of bulking agents into the urethral submucosa is designed to create artificial urethral cushions that can improve urethral coaptation and hence restore continence. Ideally, a urethral bulking agent should be non-immunogenic and biocompatible, leading to minimal inflammatory and fibrotic response. The authors present a case report of a granulomatous reaction leading to urethral prolapse, 3 months after the transurethral injection of calcium hydroxylapatite. To our knowledge, this is the first gran… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although urethral bulking is considered to be safe and simple [9,14,31], there are several reports on complications caused by the different bulking agents, such as urethral erosion [15], prolapse [42], and diverticula [43]; periurethral pseudocyst and mass formation [44]; retention; de novo frequency; sterile and nonsterile abscess formation [45]; hypersensitivity and urinary infection [15,43]; granuloma formation and possibly carcinogenesis due to particle migration [43]; need for endoscopic evacuation due to bladder outlet obstruction [46]. Treatment-related (minor) adverse events were found to occur in a range of 22-50 %, with UTI being the most common [15,38].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although urethral bulking is considered to be safe and simple [9,14,31], there are several reports on complications caused by the different bulking agents, such as urethral erosion [15], prolapse [42], and diverticula [43]; periurethral pseudocyst and mass formation [44]; retention; de novo frequency; sterile and nonsterile abscess formation [45]; hypersensitivity and urinary infection [15,43]; granuloma formation and possibly carcinogenesis due to particle migration [43]; need for endoscopic evacuation due to bladder outlet obstruction [46]. Treatment-related (minor) adverse events were found to occur in a range of 22-50 %, with UTI being the most common [15,38].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have performed more than 80 cases of CaHA injections before this complication was encountered. There is only one report each in the literature of urethral prolapse formation after collagen injection [3], carbon-coated beads injection [4], or CaHA injection [5]. We do not believe that this complication is specific for CaHA, since formation of urethral prolapse has been described with other injectable materials.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Collectively, these experiences suggest that the incidence of local CaHA migration is probably low. Nevertheless, submucosal migration of the bulking agent has been reported in isolated cases [3][4][5]9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are recent published reports of large urethral mucosa prolapses occurring following injection of this material that required surgical intervention. 33 …”
Section: Coaptite (1 Rct)mentioning
confidence: 99%