2006
DOI: 10.1086/498734
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Massive Stars and the Energy Balance of the Interstellar Medium. II. The 35MStar and a Solution to the “Missing Wind Problem”

Abstract: We continue our numerical analysis of the morphological and energetic influence of massive stars on their ambient interstellar medium for a 35 M ⊙ star that evolves from the main sequence through red supergiant and Wolf-Rayet phases, until it ultimately explodes as a supernova. We find that structure formation in the circumstellar gas during the early main-sequence evolution occurs as in the 60 M ⊙ case but is much less pronounced because of the lower mechanical wind luminosity of the star. Since on the other … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
157
2
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(173 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
13
157
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They agree with predictions from recent numerical simulations from Freyer et al (2003) and (Freyer et al 2006). The analysis by Freyer et al takes into account the action of the stellar wind and the ionizing flux from stars of 35 and 60 M and find that E kin E w is in the range 0.10−0.04.…”
Section: Scenariosupporting
confidence: 84%
“…They agree with predictions from recent numerical simulations from Freyer et al (2003) and (Freyer et al 2006). The analysis by Freyer et al takes into account the action of the stellar wind and the ionizing flux from stars of 35 and 60 M and find that E kin E w is in the range 0.10−0.04.…”
Section: Scenariosupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Capriotti & Kozminski (2001) and Freyer et al (2003Freyer et al ( , 2006 developed analytical models and hydrodynamical simulations of H ii regions, including stellar winds. At the beginning of its evolution, the young H ii region should not be significantly affected by the wind of its exciting star(s).…”
Section: Morphology and Evolution Of An H II Regionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sum in the above equation includes mass loss via different types of winds ejected by the star at different stages of stellar evolution: the main sequence stage ( Eldridge (2009). This includes the mass-loss rate from the slow red supergiant stage wind ΔM RSGS 19 M (Freyer et al 2006). Therefore, the remaining 10M of the hot intercloud gas in the γ 2 Velorum SWB correspond to fast MSS and WR winds.…”
Section: Implications For the Models Of The Wolf-rayet Starmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We can compare these estimates with the results of numerical simulations of stellar wind bubbles around WR stars. Numerical simulations of the evolution of a star with an initial mass M ini = 35 M , as proposed by Eldridge (2009) for WR11, were made by Freyer et al (2006) for an environment with a density of n 0 = 20 cm −3 and a temperature of T 0 = 200 K. They show that at the end of the calculations (before the SN explosion) the hot gas bubble has a mean radius of 34 pc and shell-like HII and HI regions of the swept up ambient gas extend out to a distance of 43−44 pc, the total mass is 1.5 × 10 5 M , the kinetic energy is 4.9 × 10 49 erg, the thermal energy of the hot gas is 1.1 × 10 50 erg, of the warm gas 4.3 × 10 49 erg, i.e., the radius, total mass and total energy (kinetic and thermal, 2×10 50 erg) are surprisingly close to our estimate for γ 2 Velorum. Nevertheless, two important differences should be clarified for γ 2 Velorum namely, the kinetic energy dominance and the low density of the ISM.…”
Section: Ivsmentioning
confidence: 99%